769
submitted 9 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

“I’m just ashamed that this bill even came into fruition,” a Lexington council member said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Clbull@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Because nothing says 'qualified immunity' quite like gunning down the homeless

I can't believe I wanted to live in America fifteen years ago. Now I wanna stay the hell away. Y'all are unhinged.

[-] uriel238 13 points 9 months ago

We were entirely unhinged in 2008. You might have been buying into Obama's Hope and Change rhetoric, but that was all just campaigning nonsense. Obama is a total neoliberal and kept most of Bush's policies.

We were in lockstep on the path to fascism even then, though media only admitted it once Trump walked away with the Republican Party.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

The problem with saying everyone is a fascist is it desensitizes everyone so they don't know what an actual fascist is.

Unless that was your plan all along...

Are you a fascist?

You sound like a fascist, so you're probably a fascist. If you're probably a fascist that means you're definitely a fascist.

When will you stop being a fascist?

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 18 points 9 months ago

Legalizing killing homeless people is pretty fuckin fascist my guy

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

You sound like Obama, who was also apparently fascist. You must be a fascist.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 9 months ago

Do you understand that the point youre making is that it is not fascist to kill a vulnerable subgroup of the population that has been marked as undesirable?

Do you also understand that your point is directly contradictory to every single professional study of real, actual fascist organizations and governments?

[-] PanArab@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Obama was violent, wasn't he?

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago

He did really like drone strikes, to the tune of more than 500 of them often involving civilian casualties.

[-] Scientician@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

People are crying fascist because fascist shit is happening.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Maybe we should make a list of things that aren't fascist, it would save a lot of time. I mean if Obama doesn't make the "not fascist" list, then what actually does make that list?

We should also consider compiling a list of actions that are not genocide, because that word seems to be slapped on everything nowadays too.

Or maybe we could create a fascist scale and grade every world leader past and present to prove that everyone is a little bit fascist and therefore fascism is nothing to worry about. "You know in some ways we could consider Obama to be a little bit fascist..."

Or maybe we should just focus on the fascists that a clear and present threat to democracy. Like Trump and Putin. Might make it a little easier to consider what needs to be done to prevent democracy from being ended by these assholes.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

No one in this thread called Obama a fascist

[-] HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

The irony in this comment

[-] PanArab@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Fascism is capitalism gone violent.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

The problem? It’s you.

[-] uriel238 2 points 9 months ago

Except in this case, the US public (the press at least) has done the introspection. The transnational white power movement, and the Christian nationalist movement (there's a lot of intersection) qualify for all of Umberto Eco's fourteen properties of fascist ideology. They also adhere to Luis Britto García's eight characteristics of Fascism. These movements also feature Emilio Gentile's ten elements of fascism.

Now I understand in the age of internet discourse, we have to be mindful of Godwin's rule of Nazi analogies, so it may not be enough for us to simply say that the US state is fascist so much as we have to be explicit about how it compares, such as (a few examples out of dozens, if not hundreds):

  • The overconfinement of inmates by the federal and state prisons, or of extrajudicial detainees in detention centers without reasonable hygiene or living provisions so that disease runs rampantly through them, what came to light during the COVID-19 lockdown.
  • The lack of reasonable oversight of law enforcement allowing them to seize or kill at will, comparable to the Freikorps irregulars from which Rohm's Sturmabteilung were recruited.
  • ICE's defiance of orders to arrest and deport immigrants only if they were convicted felons, instead arresting and detaining them at will, often deporting them not to nations of origin but into the hands of human traffickers, and sometimes detaining American citizens that were insufficiently nationalized (e.g. didn't speak English and were too dark) knowing they had a slim chance of ever getting back to home soil. Compare this to the Heydrich's Sicherheitsdienst who was ordered only to arrest and detain undesirables that were already violent criminals. Not only did Heydrich ignore the violent criminal provision but also kept adding new qualifiers to the undesirables list that qualified for arrest. His batch of detainees ballooned so quickly as to turn from a warehouse in Berlin to the massive complex of concentration camps that we were taught about in school. And we know (or should know) how that story evolves.

I studied the holocaust in the aughts once the US started doing Are We The Baddies stuff, wondering if that process might be a thing to watch for, so if you aren't sufficiently educated about the German genocide machine, and how it applies to the United States in the 2020s, there's way too much to compare.

I could go on and on and on about the capture of the federal government, the denial of judicial confirmations to President Obama, so that a Republican president (Trump) could flood the Federal judiciary with Federalist Society judges, the countless judicial carve-outs of civil protections allegedly guaranteed by the fourth, fifth and sixth amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the bloated prison state that has more inmates (total or per capita) than any other penal system on the planet, including nations that are supposed to be scary and authoritarian like China and DPRK. And if you really were interested, I could go into the specifics as to how all that compares to the German Reich starting about a Century ago.

In 2013 when Edward Snowden blew the whistle on NSA's PRISM, XKeyscore and ESCHALON programs, we had learned they were over ten years in the making. I didn't want to find out that the US is executing and incinerating people by the thousands per day, and find out we've been doing it for years now. So far we're not there yet, but it is conspicuous how much latitude law enforcement and prison officers have when it comes to cruel treatment, violence or even killing.

So yes, the US is already doing fascism by the bunches, and a couple of huge, dangerous movements are established in state and national politics that are invoking a lot of fascist narratives. But now the Republican party is looking to neuter elections in the US, make it a one-party state and swap out any official (elected, appointed or hired) that doesn't salute the new world order, as per Project 2025 by the Heritage Foundation. It's easy to websearch. That should scare the snot out of all of us regardless of whether the F-word is attached to it.

[-] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

All my life I thought y’all was a uniquely American phrase.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago

Lots of other languages have a dedicated word for second person plural, but English only has dialects that do.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You can be used plurally. Ye used to be commonly used as a second person plural but now sounds old fashioned because it fell into disuse.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"You" isn't a dedicated word, since it's typically used in singular. It's common to have something specific to the task in other languages.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Agreed, it's a little awkward to use you as a plural and that's what ye used to be used for.

But ye is even more awkward. I suspect through frequent usage, "you" as a plural would start to feel just fine.

In common conversation, it's my experience that "you guys" winds up being the winner in American English. But it gets really dreadful when the speaker is trying to address a crowd with possessives and they're using that expression.

"This is what I was asking about from your guy(essess) [sic] presentation last week"...I just...wince a bit when I hear it...and I've said things like it myself but that doesn't make it any better.

[-] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago

in Australia the equivilant would probably be "yous"

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

It is, but it’s useful so it’s spreading. I’m from the southern part of the US, so I’m all for it.

[-] SolarMech@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

And then y'all exported yer culture out to us via Hollywood.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
769 points (100.0% liked)

News

23267 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS