543
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Dave Chappelle has released a new Netflix special, The Dreamer, which is full of jokes about the trans community and disabled people.

“I love punching down!” he tells the audience, in a one-hour show that landed on the streaming service today (31 December).

It’s his seventh special for Netflix and comes two years after his last one, the highly controversial release The Closer.

That programme was criticised for its relentless jokes about the trans community, and Chappelle revisits the topic in his new show.

He tells jokes about trans women in prison, and about trans people “pretending” to be somebody they are not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lutra@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

.... its .. not ok... to ... tell... jokes... about... certain... people ?

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Punching down is the problem.

Also the whole "my brother is an asshole but if you call him that I'll punch you" thing.

If he was making jokes about a community he was involved with at all, great. If it was a trans comedian making these jokes, (probably) great.

But this is just another old out-of-touch rich guy making fun about people who are already having a shitty time (on average).

Also, notice how anyone has yet to actually forbid him from doing it. He's not being "cancelled/consequenced".

A lot of people just find it extremely distasteful. (It hasn't slowed him down in the slightest.)

[-] cannibalkitteh 9 points 10 months ago

If it was a trans comedian making these jokes, (probably) great.

Honestly, I'd be disappointed even more in a trans comedian. If, after transitioning, they went with such uninspired jokes when there's a wealth of more humorous things to joke about in transition, I'd question their sense of humor.

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Ah yeah I should have specified the jokes should be not nasty or uninformed.

But I'd hope for better from someone from within the community.

[-] eupraxia 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

semi-related tangent, I think some people misunderstand this kind of thing as "well if he was trans it would be fine."

when really, no, a trans comedian would just write different and much better jokes about this subject matter because they're immersed in it and have a deeper understanding of the community and the experience.

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Ah yeah I should have specified the jokes should be not nasty or uninformed.

But I'd hope for better from someone from within the community.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 10 months ago

I don't think it would have blown up if the original joke was good.

But it was just "this person called themselves a woman but had a cock".

And then pulled the "I have a trans friend" card. Like Dave of all people should know better than that. He seems to want to be the Bernard Manning of trans jokes.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

Depends... on... whether... the... joke... is... malicious,.. of... course.

[-] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

It's absolutely ok to tell jokes about marginalized communities

They just need to be good jokes

https://youtu.be/ffqvoJZ2HM4

I liked this video

[-] zbyte64 1 points 10 months ago

Oh, that was actually good.

[-] Lutra@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

in the quiet, the real quiet of it all, after the yelling and flaming on the internet, we have two types of thought. One that thinks that people have both the ability and the freedom to say what they think, out loud, and even to entire groups of people. And we have a group of people that thinks we are all safer and happier if we don't let them. That group also thinks we have to agree (with them), they say one word a lot, 'tolerance' but curiously they mean that in one direction: the direction they identify with. In the same way, they falsely equate :"disagreeing with me" to "hating me".

[-] itslilith 2 points 10 months ago

You can disagree about favorite football teams or ice cream flavors. If you disagree about my right to exist, then that is, in fact, hating me.

Tolerance is a social contact. We are under no obligation to be tolerant towards the intolerant: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[-] Lutra@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

we can disagree about much greater things. humans have and have figured it out.

we can disagree about eating animals. for me it may be a sacrilege and for my neighbor it may be lunch. I am under no obligation to agree with her, nor is she under any obligation to agree with me.

She can think I am insane for protecting a dumb animal.

I can think she is insane for destroying life.

She can offend my morality. And I hers. This is disagreement. We do not have to agree, and we have every right to our understanding of the universe.

I will avoid mentioning other real-er areas because it gets people all in a tizzy and makes this kind of discussion take far too long. but if we extrapolate just a bit, disagreeing with another person, even about deeply held beliefs is part of what we do in civilization.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
543 points (100.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
2334 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS