754

Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.

In the Economist/YouGov poll — conducted via web-based interviews Dec. 16-18 — more than half (53 percent) of registered voters under 30 said they would support Biden, and less than a quarter (24 percent) said they would support Trump.

Another 10 percent said they would support another candidate, 4 percent said they were not sure, and 9 percent said they wouldn’t vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 152 points 2 years ago

Young voters are being given really shitty choices.

[-] derphurr@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

Doesn't matter, over half won't be voting. Even less than normal if GOP state legislatures do away with mail in ballots or automatic mailed request forms from COVID times.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 years ago

The less people who vote the more elections Republicans win.

Make sure your friends go vote (unless they’re trumpeter assholes maybe, then don’t talk about it).

Less young people voting is a direct result of the national DNC’s deeply infuriating tactic of promising a fuckton of stuff and then just abandoning those goals and… “compromising” with the GOP every single fucking time the chips are down. And here, “compromise” is pronounced “submit to”, because most Democrats have the neurological inability to understand that these days the GOP will betray them simply on principle, or because one GOP rep wants to tweet something so they can “troll the libs”. And then we all suffer for it.

We all fucking understand the stakes here. The DNC is actively pushing young voters away by using such a deeply cynical strategy and then thinking we’ll forget all about that stupidity the next time an election comes around. From where a lot of young people are standing, it looks a lot like a choice between “actively bad” and “passively bad”, and it’s hard to give a fuck about that, especially if you’re already struggling with other shit in your life, like most of our generation is to one degree or another.

Don’t get me wrong - I vote in every single election I can. But the amount of deeply, fundamentally uninspiring or even actively bad candidates I feel I’m forced to vote for, simply because they’re not a neo-Nazi or a member of the GOP is not small. And to all you vOTe fOr a ThiRD pArTY types out there: you and I both know that’s a great way to hand elections to the GOP, given how our shitty electoral system works.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

The party is absolutely taking advantage of how bad their opponents have become. Democratic party leadership has regarded the left of the party with such withering contempt for so long, and then they wonder why the left resents them.

It’s super frustrating, because while I still think it’s possible to move the DNC in a more reliably progressive direction, it’s abundantly clear all the fossils in charge of the party have no intention whatsoever of going in that direction, so we either need to force them out or wait for them to die.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

And in the meantime, the planet is warming and the fascists they keep "compromising" with only need to win once.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Less than 50% voter turnout is a sign of a healthy democracy /s

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Should I have added a /s ? My bad lmao, that's on me

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
[-] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

This is obviously sarcasm lol

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

This must be a joke.

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sharkfucker420, fuckin awesome username lol. Is this a joke or no?

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

This is a joke lol, added a /s for clarity

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

I wonder when this magical time was where voting for the president had great choices. What many young voters fail to understand is that it’s not all about the president. Get enough Democrats into Congress, and they will be able to vote for progressive legislation, and if you send that to your far-from-ideal president’s desk, they’ll sign it.

It's certainly a much easier task than having an awesome progressive president who begs a near 50-50 Congress to pass good bills, and it just doesn’t happen.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Get enough Democrats into Congress, and they will be able to vote for progressive legislation,

We had 60 and they killed the public option. How many do we need?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

People need to study how the Moral Majority took control of the GOP. Nixon was a dead duck after he lost his California Senate race, but he knew that an ex-Vice President was a big deal in small places. He campaigned tirelessly for years, getting lots of Reps, Governors, and Mayors elected. In 1968 he breezed in because he had the Party base on his side.

The MMs did the same. They would show up at every local GOP meeting with enoughvotes to get their agenda enacted. One day the Party big shots looked around and realized that all the dog catchers, county clerks, and sheriffs in their state were MMs.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago
[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Abbreviation for the Moral Majority that they mentioned in the first paragraph.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Oh gotcha thanks.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Thanks for explaining

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Ok, so we need to force the system to change outside of its normal paths of power to have choices. No one thinks this time existed, everyone understands the current situation is bad.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

People need to study how the Moral Majority took control of the GOP. Nixon was a dead duck after he lost his California Senate race, but he knew that an ex-Vice President was a big deal in small places. He campaigned tirelessly for years, getting lots of Reps, Governors, and Mayors elected. In 1968 he breezed in because he had the Party base on his side.

The MMs did the same. They would show up at every local GOP meeting with enoughvotes to get their agenda enacted. One day the Party big shots looked around and realized that all the dog catchers, county clerks, and sheriffs in their state were MMs.

repeated comment

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Right? This poll is literally the same as asking young voters if they would rather have their entire heads cut off or just their eyes and ears gouged out.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago

What on earth are you talking about? Joe Biden tried to give 20k to each of them who went to college. And he would have if the--let me check my notes here: oh, right--Nazis in the other party hadn't sued to prevent him from giving away money.

I appreciate that Biden might not be some folks' first choice, but if you think young people believe another four years of Grampa Joe is just barely more tolerable than the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist traitors, you might need to meet one.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Brother he's basically a war criminal the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist dictators is already happening

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Unlike that peace-lover Trump who only cares about the welfare of the Palestinian people, right?

[-] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

You misspelled Russia.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Centrists falsely interpret all criticism of Biden as support for Trump. It's dishonest.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

And realists know that bashing Biden with no nuance, as these comments are doing, does nothing but benefit Republicans.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Centrists just want everyone to their left and only their left to shut up.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Then what you're telling us is there is no opportunity for improvement... Clinton was 30 years ago and Biden is to the right of Clinton. Three decades of "incremental progress" has gotten us nowhere.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's gotten centrists where they want to go.

[-] ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

interpret all criticism of Biden as support for Trump

When you don't vote, therefore allowing Trump to win the election...then yeah.

Equating the above with "all criticism" is what's dishonest. Plenty of people criticize Biden who voted for him once, and they are still voting for him again. But you know that. We might not like him but believe it or not, we dislike fascism even more. Crazy, I know.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It doesn't really matter in the long run, America is run by oil companies, not the people. Joe signed off on more land for drilling than trump did.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 22 points 2 years ago

He seems to be doing a pretty good job given his poor circumstances where the Republican house and supreme court are both totally useless.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

He didn't have those issues in his first two years. His own party blocked his agenda.

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

Wel the first two years we had the fuckheads Sinema and Manchin who are basically republicans at this point

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

This...just absolutely this. I was going to post something along the lines of it being a choice between eating shit or being flayed alive, but this is just better. Kudos.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Wow you guys are so original 🙄

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

Maybe pay attention to what's actually happening rather than just repeating what other people say about him.

Biden is continuing to seek (and find) pathways to forgiving student loan debt, despite the Supreme Court ruling against his program. Millions of people have had their loans forgiven since that decision, and it seems more are getting it every day.

Anyone who thinks he's senile or incoherent should listen to the interview he did on Conan O'Brien's podcast that was released the other day. I was surprised that it went so well, and Biden was far more lucid than I've ever seen Trump.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I don't think he's senile, I just think he's out of touch. It's hard to be in touch as an 80-some year old man.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
754 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25075 readers
2186 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS