754

Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.

In the Economist/YouGov poll — conducted via web-based interviews Dec. 16-18 — more than half (53 percent) of registered voters under 30 said they would support Biden, and less than a quarter (24 percent) said they would support Trump.

Another 10 percent said they would support another candidate, 4 percent said they were not sure, and 9 percent said they wouldn’t vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Right? This poll is literally the same as asking young voters if they would rather have their entire heads cut off or just their eyes and ears gouged out.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago

What on earth are you talking about? Joe Biden tried to give 20k to each of them who went to college. And he would have if the--let me check my notes here: oh, right--Nazis in the other party hadn't sued to prevent him from giving away money.

I appreciate that Biden might not be some folks' first choice, but if you think young people believe another four years of Grampa Joe is just barely more tolerable than the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist traitors, you might need to meet one.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Brother he's basically a war criminal the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist dictators is already happening

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Unlike that peace-lover Trump who only cares about the welfare of the Palestinian people, right?

[-] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

You misspelled Russia.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Centrists falsely interpret all criticism of Biden as support for Trump. It's dishonest.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

And realists know that bashing Biden with no nuance, as these comments are doing, does nothing but benefit Republicans.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Centrists just want everyone to their left and only their left to shut up.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Then what you're telling us is there is no opportunity for improvement... Clinton was 30 years ago and Biden is to the right of Clinton. Three decades of "incremental progress" has gotten us nowhere.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's gotten centrists where they want to go.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I mean, you can only appease fascists for so long before it starts to look like collaboration.

[-] ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

interpret all criticism of Biden as support for Trump

When you don't vote, therefore allowing Trump to win the election...then yeah.

Equating the above with "all criticism" is what's dishonest. Plenty of people criticize Biden who voted for him once, and they are still voting for him again. But you know that. We might not like him but believe it or not, we dislike fascism even more. Crazy, I know.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

My criticism of Biden is totally my endorsement of trump for sure

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Do you have the name of a third person who has a chance of being elected in 2024?

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

? So I should just love Biden? I don't understand what you mean. I never said anything about voting did I?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

This is a thread about young voters and their willingness to vote for Biden.

So if you weren't talking about voting, were you just changing the subject to talk about what you wanted to talk about? I'd say that's pretty discourteous to the person who posted this.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I was responding to a comment, that was basically it. I was expressing dislike for a presidential candidate in a thread about presidential candidates

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Also I came back to say this. How do you not see Biden and Trump being our only feasible options as inherently undemocratic? People only like them in comparison to the other. We should not be forced to choose between two objective evils. Are you so resigned to stagnation that you think continuing to enforce a system that exploits is the best option?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What should or shouldn't happen is not relevant to reality.

The reality is no one is going to change the fact that either a Democrat or a Republican is going to be president in 2024

I notice you couldn't name any other viable options. I think that means you realize that.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yes I realize that. It's painfully obvious and it's fucked. However I don't think this can be changed by voting for the lesser evil who is constantly getting more evil

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Again- there are two viable options. A Democrat or a Republican. What does voting for anyone else accomplish? Did voting for Perot change the status quo in 1992? Did voting for Nader change the status quo in 2000? No.

If you want to do the self-congratulating, performative act of voting for someone who has no chance of winning, go for it. If I felt that way, I just wouldn't vote because it would make the same amount of difference but I wouldn't have had to make an effort. Either way, the only one who will know what you did is you.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It doesn't really matter in the long run, America is run by oil companies, not the people. Joe signed off on more land for drilling than trump did.

[-] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

I believe those were agreements signed by Trump that Biden had to follow through on, no?

But let’s also be clear, Biden appointed the first Native Secretary of the Interior and signed the Inflation Reduction Act (the most significant climate legislation the US has ever had). Trump appointed Scott Pruitt to lead the EPA.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

One will kill us slightly faster than the other. Great.

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 22 points 2 years ago

He seems to be doing a pretty good job given his poor circumstances where the Republican house and supreme court are both totally useless.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

He didn't have those issues in his first two years. His own party blocked his agenda.

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

Wel the first two years we had the fuckheads Sinema and Manchin who are basically republicans at this point

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Sinema didn't kill the minimum wage increase by herself. She was one of 8 democrats to vote against workers.

Manchin is the perfect centrist Democrat.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

This...just absolutely this. I was going to post something along the lines of it being a choice between eating shit or being flayed alive, but this is just better. Kudos.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Wow you guys are so original 🙄

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

We totally are. thanks.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

Maybe pay attention to what's actually happening rather than just repeating what other people say about him.

Biden is continuing to seek (and find) pathways to forgiving student loan debt, despite the Supreme Court ruling against his program. Millions of people have had their loans forgiven since that decision, and it seems more are getting it every day.

Anyone who thinks he's senile or incoherent should listen to the interview he did on Conan O'Brien's podcast that was released the other day. I was surprised that it went so well, and Biden was far more lucid than I've ever seen Trump.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I don't think he's senile, I just think he's out of touch. It's hard to be in touch as an 80-some year old man.

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
754 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25075 readers
2234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS