826
submitted 2 years ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

The "killer feature" is that they pay more to the developers, so if you are getting the exact same game on (e.g.) Steam versus Epic Games, then whomever actually made the game gets more money from the Epic sale. Isn't that a good thing?

(Note that I may be conflating the publisher with the developer, but either way, it's still the case that less money is taken by intermediaries, which is a good thing.)

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 22 points 2 years ago

Except they only do that because its the only way to get publishers to use them over steam, and once they have a reliable customer base they will reneg on that generosity to gain profit.

We know this business strategy. It will not stay that way.

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Quite likely, but until then...

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 2 years ago

Until then, what? You as the consumer have no incentive to use their worse service, and publishers clearly arent that enticed by it for how few exclusives the store gets?

Or until then, you want to reward a bait and switch that you know is a bait and switch to try and trick you into using a worse product?

Which option are you excited about here?

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Their service is in no way worse: I buy games, and I get them.

I'm excited about the fact that someone provides an alternative to the monopoly that is Steam.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 2 years ago

......... The ability to purchase is not the only aspect of a stores service

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It's all I need: I buy a game, I download and play it. I don't need anything else.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 2 years ago

Ok, and? All you need is water and moldy bread to not die, that doesnt mean water and moldy bread are equivalent in quality to a 3 course meal.

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Having a bunch of features that I don't want or need is a waste. The Epic Store and Steam both do exactly what I need, so I don't care about any of whatever the other features are.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 2 years ago

So, you dont own any non xbox controllers? Or want to play games properly with friends? Or, hell, want to find a non AAA game? Since epic has way fewer games, and loses a lot of indie darlings?

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Correct, correct, not correct (but if they don't sell what I want, then I would buy it elsewhere).

[-] beefcat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

this is how we get companies like walmart and amazon.

they roll in, throwing bags of money into a bottomless pit as long as it takes to amass a large customer base and ruin existing competitors. Then they start enshittifying, and everyone wonders where all the competition went.

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

No, Steam are the monopoly now! The only other option is Good Old Games and for weird indie titles Itch.io.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago

That's a reason for developers to use them, not for consumers to use them.

EPICs anti-customer practices (such as trying to make everything exclusive) are reasons for consumers not to use them.

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

There are tens of thousands of Steam-exclusive games: https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/List_of_games_exclusive_to_Steam

What is the alternative to Steam?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

And are those because Steam is trying to pressure them into being exclusive on Steam? Or did they just not bother releasing anywhere else?

If a developer just wants to release on Epic and nowhere else they can do that. My issue comes from Epic approaching games that have already announced a Steam release asking for exclusivity, and having no interest in hosting the game if they don't accept the exclusivity offer.

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

There are almost 40,000 entries, I obviously cannot answer for all of them.

Still waiting for you to answer my question.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Well you sound like someone trying to have a good faith discussion and attempting to continue would be a good use of my time.

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

What is the alternative to Steam?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

As I said.

(The linked article is about Epic)

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Exactly. Not having an alternative marketplace--and no other one exists--is anti-customer and yet, you seem to have no problem with a Steam monopoly. Why?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

"it exists" is not enough reason to use something.

If I start an online store that charges twice as much as Steam and has none of the features are you going to purchase from it just because It'S cOmPeTiTioN tO StEaM's MoNoPoLy?

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Probably not. Do games on the Epic Store cOSt TwIcE aS MucH? Do you routinely buy goods and services with irrelevant features to your needs?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

So we agree that it's unreasonable to purchase from a store that provides worse service just because it exists or to "promote competition".

EPICs anti-customer practices (such as trying to make everything exclusive) are reasons for consumers not to use them.

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

No and it's not worse service.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

However because of their 40% ownership, you're ALSO giving more money to Tencent.

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Wait tencent has ownership of epic games?

[-] averyfalken 8 points 2 years ago
[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Yikes. Good point.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No, because epic has been engaging in anti consumer practices from the start. This is literally the only category epic has a leg up on steam, and if they didn't need to bully their way into the marketplace, I have no reason to believe they'd treat creators any better than they currently do customers

edit: The revelation that they are running the store at a loss just furthers me not believing they are helping developers from the goodness of their heart, it shows they're likely running the Walmart strategy of using their vast wealth to choke out their competition until there is none, and then once they have a monopoly, jack everything up, which'd probably include their cut of the pie

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Note that I may be conflating the publisher with the developer

You think?

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, I do, or else I wouldn't have mentioned it. I'd prefer the publisher gets money over a middleman store. Isn't that preferable?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Its a phrase that signals something else, and not a literal content reply.

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

How about you write what you mean and have quality conversation in the future?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

How about you write what you mean

I did. Its a standard phrase used by people in conversation. See defintion #2 below.

Below definition is from here ...

you think

  1. A question one uses at the end of a sentence to express uncertainty. We're not going to get into trouble—you think?
  2. A sarcastic rhetorical question used as a retort when someone states the obvious. A: "Wow, I bet that fire is really hot." B: "You think?"

and have quality conversation in the future?

Quality is in the eye of the beholder, apparently. /shrug

[-] koavf@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I did.

If you did, then I answered the genuine question you asked.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
826 points (100.0% liked)

Games

40002 readers
1800 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS