365
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Opium production in Afghanistan has plummeted since the Taliban banned cultivation of the poppy plant, according to a UN report published on Sunday.

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers pledged to wipe out the country's drug industry, banning poppy cultivation in April 2022.

Poppy plants are the source of opium and heroin. Afghanistan was the world's biggest opium producer and a major source for heroin in Europe and Asia before the Taliban takeover.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sfgifz@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago

The UNODC said the Taliban crackdown on the poppy industry could have a negative impact on many Afghans' livelihoods and warned of "humanitarian consequences for many vulnerable rural communities.

So to stop growing drugs is a bad thing now?

[-] s7ryph@kbin.social 78 points 1 year ago

We never stopped it for a reason during all the time the US was there. You need to establish an alternative income for the farmers. They grow poppy because it feeds their families. Ironically the big profits were only seen by the Taliban and not the actual farmers.

Now the farmers can’t just switch to almonds or other high value crops instantly so they will go broke. And many of the US attempts to fund the transition away from poppies were corrupted by Afghan government, making farmers move back to poppies.

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

20 years of US occupation and almost 50k civilian deaths and its worse than before, sounds about right.

[-] teichflamme@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The main takeaway is this backwards country cannot be fixed by anyone and shouldn't be supported

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Women in Kabul in the 1970s:

Looks to me like it was fixed just fine before it was broken.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

everyone always posting pictures of Persian women in the 70s wearing western clothing and claiming it was better.... you are looking at a very small sliver of the population who are wealthy

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're not Persian women, they're Afghani. And it was better for them because they could wear whatever they wanted, go to school and listen to music.

[-] Cinner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And it lasted all of, what, a decade? For an extremely small, wealthy elite minority of the population. The vast, vast majority were still rural, and I assure you they didn't build a national rural system of education and culture in that decade.

1965 - The Afghan Communist Party secretly forms. The group’s principal leaders are Babrak Karmal and Nur Mohammad Taraki.

1973 - Khan overthrows the last king, Mohammed Zahir Shah, in a military coup. Khan’s regime, the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan, comes to power. Khan abolishes the monarchy and names himself president. The Republic of Afghanistan is established with firm ties to the USSR.

1975-1977 - Khan proposes a new constitution that grants women rights and works to modernize the largely communist state. He also cracks down on opponents, forcing many suspected of not supporting Khan out of the government.

1978 - Khan is killed in a communist coup. Nur Mohammad Taraki, one of the founding members of the Afghan Communist Party, takes control of the country as president, and Babrak Karmal is named deputy prime minister. They proclaim independence from Soviet influence, and declare their policies to be based on Islamic principles, Afghan nationalism and socioeconomic justice. Taraki signs a friendship treaty with the Soviet Union. But a rivalry between Taraki and Hafizullah Amin, another influential communist leader, leads to fighting between the two sides.

At the same time, conservative Islamic and ethnic leaders who objected to social changes introduced by Khan begin an armed revolt in the countryside. In June, the guerrilla movement Mujahadeen is created to battle the Soviet-backed government.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/asia-jan-june11-timeline-afghanistan

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I'm well aware.

Still same shit, (slightly) different country.

Still very few privileged people.

Imagine if these opium farmers showed pictures of yachts and said this is America?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Very few as opposed to zero? And was it the law that women had to be covered up and weren't allowed to go to school or listen to music?

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Dude, you're missing the point. Do you give a fuck what luxurious lifestyle Eric Trump is living? Does his life indicate in any way what your life is like?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I give a fuck that it's illegal for women to wear whatever they want, go to school or listen to music. I'd say that makes the lives of all women in Afghanistan worse.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I agree! But showing a picture of a couple of privileged Tajik women really doesn't contribute anything!!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry... you know they are Tajik how?

[-] Cinner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Narrator: not realizing how far he was moving the goalposts, he had lost the plot.

[-] technicalogical@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This wasn’t what life looked like on the farm.

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Thats kinda rough. America sucks but I am sure it can be fixed if americans want to fix it

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am doubtful. The powers that be are simply resting their legs on the American people. I imagine if we actually pushed back they might start unfolding the real weapons of oppression. Once upon a time we fought the robber barron's and won. Not sure it will be so simple the next time.

[-] sfgifz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

That's a valid point, though the article sounds like cultivation was going on during the the time the Taliban wasn't in control and is now being banned by them.

I have no doubt that the actual farmers got nothing of value in either regimes though.

[-] zepheriths@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Considering Street Fentanyl and Carfentanyl yeah. Believe it or not ( I can't believe I am saying this) plant based opiates are weaker and therefore safer than the synthetic stuff. The removal of the weaker stuff leads to an increase in risk for addiction to synthetic opiates across the world

Times a changin' old man better keep up before you get left behind.

[-] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

Only when enemies of America do it. After all, won't somebody think of big pharmas profits?

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

It's alright, just hike the price of some drug no other company produces by 9001%. What's the gubmint gonna do, regulate prices?

[-] ours@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It's complicated. Afghanistan had made hydro projects with the West back in the day. Those pushed salt up the water table. Guess what plant is fine with that saltier soil?

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[-] sik0fewl@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I'm sure they will be able to farm other things... like food.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
365 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39032 readers
1894 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS