531
submitted 2 years ago by TinyPizza@kbin.social to c/world@lemmy.world

“No one is looking at us or the extent of this disaster or the crimes that we are experiencing in Gaza,” he said. Still holding his microphone, he slid off his flak jacket marked with the word PRESS and unstrapped his helmet.

“These protection jackets and helmets don't protect us,” he said, flinging the equipment to the ground. “Nothing protects journalists. ... We lose our lives for no reason.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 166 points 2 years ago

This is heartbreaking, I don’t know what else to say. The justification that these casualties are acceptable because “Hamas is there too” is just nonsense. If that’s the case why won’t Israel let civilians cross the border into Israel to prevent their murder?

[-] SayJess 79 points 2 years ago

That would humanize those whom they oppress.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 59 points 2 years ago

I doubt Hamas was at this reporter's house, which was singled out by Israel for an airstrike, which they then pretended to know nothing about.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

You’re probably right, I’m just trying to get ahead of their typical excuse for collateral damage

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago

It's not even collateral damage is it? It's the damage they intend to inflict, killing journalists who dare to show the world what Israel is doing.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Not just journalists, kill the journalist AND his entire family by waiting until he gets home and then bombing his house.

Hamas look like angels compared to israel

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Hamas look like angels compared to Israel.

Idk if I'd go that far. Hamas is at least honest about it, though. They don't try to hide the fact that they want every Jew dead. Israel will continue to genocide Palestinians while denying that the whole time.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] V17@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago

If that’s the case why won’t Israel let civilians cross the border into Israel to prevent their murder?

Whether you agree with Israeli attacks or not, obviously the answer to this is because it's impossible to filter out Hamas terrorists, which is the main thing they're trying to prevent.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 32 points 2 years ago

Your right, best to kill them all then. What do you agree with btw?

[-] V17@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Your right, best to kill them all then.

Where did you get that?

What do you agree with btw?

I'm not happy with what Israel is doing. But I don't know of a better way to get rid of Hamas either. And I'm convinced that if we want a free Palestine and a working two state solution, freeing it from Hamas has to be the first step without which no sustainable situation with Israel can ever be achieved.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

I'm sure this will work about as well as the US attempt to get rid of the Taliban. Or as well as any of the other instances in the past of trying to get rid of an ideological group through violence.

It doesn't work. It makes everything worse. It radicalizes survivors and kills lots of innocent people.

Some day maybe humanity will collectively abandon these cycles of hatred and violence played out over decades. But I doubt it.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

I should have put an /s there I guess. You don't know a better way than genocide? If the treatment kills the host then it is not in fact a cure.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Better way is easy: a one state solution like Israel claims it wants would be better than this. Declare everyone in Palestine an Israeli citizen, move in law enforcement in force, and arrest murderers for murder.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cogman@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

So, you believe Israel can identify a Hamas terrorist remotely to bomb them, but can't identify Hamas terrorists when they are at the border in person?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

My dude has never seen a customs office or checkpoint in his life

No its obviously because Israel doesn't care about Palestinians lol. They wouldn't have literally any of these issues if they hadn't been doing like 80 years worth of state sponsored occupation and murder.

You really think the people in Gaza chose to willingly leave their former homes and land to move into a military enclave?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Either they’re armed and easy to identify or they’re not at which point there’s one less person to worry about shooting Israeli soldiers while their tunnel network is dismantled. I don’t see the problem.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why does Israel not let people leave and use its famed intelligence services to identify who the Hamas fighters are? It is looking like the Israeli government simply prefers collective punishment or even genocide.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

They even deported some stranded Palestinian workers to Gaza. Imagine that!

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I wanna preface this with "Israel is clearly in the wrong for these attacks and civilians casualties are not an acceptable consequence of this conflict" but as others have already mentions: Israel not taking in Palestinians is very clearly because you can't reliably filter out hamas from Palestinian civilians. That doesn't make what their doing OK, it's just the very obvious reason for them not doing what you're suggesting. It doesn't help that these continues attacks probably makes the civilians population more likely to want to retaliate against the government. "You make the monsters you want to fight" and a that.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago

The denial of basic necessities for human survival and the driving of civilians southward is a coordinated push to expel the populous from the Gaza Strip. They've attempted back channel deals to scrub Egypt's debt for them to take in the civilians. Their "plan" to ship the expelled around the world has been leaked. People understand this, and thus, the only logical solution is for Israel to take care of these people whose lives they are shattering. They can't leave their land or Israeli land or they won't get it back. Whether it's worth dying over is largely out of the Palestinians in Gaza hands for the moment.

This can't be made someone else's problem, because that's exactly what Israel wants and that should make their motivations very clear.

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Are you actually suggesting Israel take over Palestine and absorb the civilians populations. That's insane. Theirs decades of hate and anguish here, Israel would need to keep the Palestinians isolated from the Israeli population for fear of retaliation and the Palestinians would live under constant observation for fear of retaliating. Israel can't deradicalise Palestine when their a good chunk of the reason Palestinians are radicalised into hamas. The only sensible solution is egypt taking over the region and promising diplomatic responses to Israel instead of continued conflict but they don't for the same reason: because they don't want the radical element of hamas under their governance. In the end the only end I see is Palestinians expelling hamas or Israel wiping them out because the alternative is continued conflict forever (which i suppose is also possible, it's been that way for years after all).

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

It's not my suggestion, it very much appears to be what they are doing in Gaza. Removing their right to self determination is also not a solution. The UN is a much better force to act as interim peacekeepers. I don't think either of us are probably going to be the ones to crack the peace nut. All that I am saying is that secondary evidence and leaks point to a future where the people of Gaza have been removed and I very much believe Israels intent is to never let them back in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pasta4u@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Why would you let people who may or may not be criminals / terrorists into your country ? What do you think this is the usa southern border ?

Would you let random people come flooding into your house ?

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago

*Racist bigot has entered the chat

[-] Pasta4u@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Great way to announce yourself

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The US southern border is so scary. Migrant workers enter the US every day, it's terrible. These people are going to ruin America by looking for better lives for themselves and their families. /s

I've lived very close to the US/Mexico border most of my life. There aren't any criminals and terrorists coming to live here. It's all just people looking for better lives. The criminals smuggle drugs and people over, but they don't move over here too often, and even if they do, it's just to sell drugs. There are no terrorists amongst them, idk where you got that idea.

Don't fall for right wing propaganda about the US/Mexico border.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

How do you know who is Hamas and who is a civilian? It's not like Hamas honorably sticks to identifiable uniforms in this war they started

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago

The war has been going on since long before October.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cogman@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're right, so let's just declare everyone in Gaza Hamas and bomb everyone. Right? Isn't that Israel's current policy?

Hey, why don't we speed things up and nuke the area. Wouldn't that be more efficient?

Killing civilian children is not an appropriate response to terrorism.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

If they filter through the border they can’t be armed. It’d be pretty easy to take away all their arms if no one was left to guard their tunnels.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
531 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48842 readers
1876 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS