717

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer seemed at a lost of words at the justification being used to bomb a refugee camp in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 2 years ago

Fucking hell. IDF is doing an indefensible acts speedrun, I guess.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Hamas was the target, they surrounded their leaders with innocent people. It's a common tactic with terrorists.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 143 points 2 years ago

And? If there's a hostage situation, the answer is not to blow up the entire building, hostages and all.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 31 points 2 years ago

Even Russians don't blow the entire building, they just gas it.

[-] AttackPanda@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Nah. We watched the Russians blow up the buildings in realtime without even worrying if military personnel were housed there. IIRC that was the theater bombing one that I am thinking of.

[-] Instigate@aussie.zone 20 points 2 years ago

Yeah, Israel are straight-up taking plays from the Soviet handbook here. Indiscriminate murder of civilians is okay if you get one bad dude. They’ve already dehumanised Palestinians beyond belief, it’s no wonder that they view murder of innocent Palestinians as being completely different to murder of innocent Israelis.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

And that's the most disturbing part of it.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago

They blew up that whole theater in Mariupol full of sheltering women and children, early on in the war. That must have killed hundreds.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That wasn't a hostage situation that was plain ethnic cleansing. Russia has thrown pretty much the whole of the male population in the occupied territories in the meat grinder by now, btw.

What OP is referring to is the Dubrovka crisis where Chechens took tons of hostages in a theatre and Russia pumped the whole thing full of gas, probably some fast-acting opioid. Which isn't that bad of a way to diffuse a situation they just failed to inform EMTs on what they've used or at least how patients should be treated which meant a lot more respiratory failures than was necessary. Still a better outcome than storming the thing and the Chechens blowing everything up.

A russian classic, really:

С утра садимся мы в телегу;
Мы рады голову сломать
И, презирая лень и негу,
Кричим: валяй, ебёна мать!

At dawn we jump inside the wagon,
Quite happy for our necks to break.
Scorning all soft delight and languor,
We yell "Get going, for fuck's sake!"

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

I agree, but militaries will absolutely strike any high value target no matter the civilian cost. That's the human cost of war and why we have rules of war. Hamas doesn't follow those rules and the IDF has labeled them illegal combatants. Thus, in a legal sense, these strikes are being carried out. It absolutely is sickening but this is what Hamas wants to happen.

[-] livus@kbin.social 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's not really relevant what Hamas wants to happen. The civilians don't want to be murdered.

These are war crimes no matter what either of the beligerants think/want.

Most international law experts are already coming down on the side of civilian starvation being war crimes. History is going to judge this a lot more harshly than the talking heads of US/Israeli news.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I don't think anyone is saying they do.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Is bombing a hospital ok in the rules of war? Because they bombed the only cancer hospital in Gaza yesterday.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Ask Assad. He once bombed 4 hospitals in a day, and IRC at one point doctors in Syria stopped telling the UN where their hospitals were located, because their warnings to not target these hospitals was being used by the Syrians as targetting suggestions.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago

Shit, is he bombing Palestine too? Otherwise he’s irrelevant to this conversation

[-] jungle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sure, we don't want no context here. That only makes this less black and white, and nobody ain't got time for that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Hamas bombed a hospital by mistake. War zones are dangerous.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

You're referring to the PIJ, not Hamas. And even the PIJ being responsible is very much in question at the moment as more information is obtained on those events. See the New York Times analysis from the other day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] V17@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No idea why you're downvoted, this is objectively true. One may consider it disgusting or morally indefensible, but a) unless Israel is lying about the presence of legitimate targets in the area it is not illegal b) using civilians as human shields is a staple Hamas tactic.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

The truth is very hard to swallow. I served in Iraq and Afghanistan, I've witnessed this stupidity first hand. Terrorists are cowards who hide behind civilians. They want civilians to die because for every civilian killed they gain more bodies to their cause.

[-] Stanard@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

So so very close to piecing together why bombing a refugee camp even if there are terrorists or supporting infrastructure located there is a terrible idea.

I truly don't know how you can recognize that Hamas wants civilians to die because it will strengthen their numbers, and still excuse the bombing of civilians. Perhaps you're just trolling?

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 years ago

I served in Iraq and Afghanistan

This explains so much about all the shit you're smearing all over Lemmy. You just miss murdering Arabs.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I am an engineer, I built schools, hospitals, and other public services. Few military personnel serve in combat roles.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago

Oh, so you're just keeping your role of whitewashing a brutal occupation going then.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I don't support either side of the conflict.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 years ago

Yet you're only justifying one side's actions.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I don't support either side. Both sides have made no effort towards diplomacy. Both sides have focused on violence.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 years ago

Sure, if your knowledge of the conflict only goes back a month.

[-] Ya_Boy_Skinny_Penis@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Lol and you get downvoted because you're not meeting the bloodthirsty soldier narrative that Lemmy's unemployed communists love to parrot.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

You're probably correct. I'm rather antiwar and pro diplomacy.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

Yes, I've heard the US operation in Iraq was very successful in defeating the Taliban. Oh wait...

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The Taliban are in Afghanistan and the U.S. mission was never against them, ever. Perhaps you should look up basic information first.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

Oh, was Iraq justified with Saddam's "weapon's of mass destruction" that didn't exist? Sorry, got my lies mixed up.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Iraq was GWB wanting to make his daddy proud. On the ground things were fine until his dumbass fired the entire Iraqi military. That's when it all went to hell. It did lead to a United Iraq, but it took 12 years.

[-] wryan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I can't help but parrot exactly what @V17 said. People just don't want to hear the realities of war.

[-] wryan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago
[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 21 points 2 years ago

As we all know, legal experts prefer to say “all’s fair in love and war” than to follow Geneva conventions.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 53 points 2 years ago

“But even if that Hamas commander was there amidst all those Palestinian refugees who are in that Jabalya refugee camp, Israel still went ahead and dropped a bomb there attempting to kill this Hamas commander knowing that a lot of innocent civilians—men, women, and children—presumably would be killed?” Blitzer asked. “Is that what I’m hearing?”

Dude, Wolf Blitzer gets it. Don't let yourself seem like the less reasonable party when Wolf Blitzer's involved.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

I don't think the Israeli government cares anymore than the Iranian government cared about killing its people. Any government based on religion is going to be intolerant of nonconforming behaviors and other religious beliefs. Separation of church and state is a requirement for successful societies.

[-] NewDark@lemmings.world 13 points 2 years ago

This is not a religious conflict. It's imperialist and settler colonial. This headass take needs to stop.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Then why hasn’t Israel declared war on all other Muslim countries?

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Because they haven't attacked Israel. Seems pretty simple.

[-] NewDark@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago

If I'm a Palestinian, and I am / convert to Judaism. Can I join Israel? (no)

Also, how many Israelis have a Jewish religion? (they are the minority, it's mostly non believers)

How does this fit in it being religious instead of ethnic you think?

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Iran killing it's own people or the Israelis? For sure on religion being a blight to the progress of humanity. I'd say I'm still perplexed, but honestly just meh. I've read enough weird shit today.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ive witnessed too much of it in the last 20 years. I'm tried of seeing innocent people killed to defend a religion.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago

I feel like we're already at the bottom of the barrel when serial teleprompter reader Wolf Blitzer gets it.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

It's unreal right? It's like some body snatcher type shit and it's everyday. Tomorrow some even more baffling combination of sorrows will somehow make this look tame. We are living the curse of "may you live in interesting times."

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
717 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48099 readers
1918 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS