717

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer seemed at a lost of words at the justification being used to bomb a refugee camp in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I agree, but militaries will absolutely strike any high value target no matter the civilian cost. That's the human cost of war and why we have rules of war. Hamas doesn't follow those rules and the IDF has labeled them illegal combatants. Thus, in a legal sense, these strikes are being carried out. It absolutely is sickening but this is what Hamas wants to happen.

[-] livus@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not really relevant what Hamas wants to happen. The civilians don't want to be murdered.

These are war crimes no matter what either of the beligerants think/want.

Most international law experts are already coming down on the side of civilian starvation being war crimes. History is going to judge this a lot more harshly than the talking heads of US/Israeli news.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think anyone is saying they do.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Is bombing a hospital ok in the rules of war? Because they bombed the only cancer hospital in Gaza yesterday.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Ask Assad. He once bombed 4 hospitals in a day, and IRC at one point doctors in Syria stopped telling the UN where their hospitals were located, because their warnings to not target these hospitals was being used by the Syrians as targetting suggestions.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

Shit, is he bombing Palestine too? Otherwise he’s irrelevant to this conversation

[-] jungle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, we don't want no context here. That only makes this less black and white, and nobody ain't got time for that.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

What additional context does an unrelated conflict provide?

[-] jungle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can read the thread yourself, I'm not going to waste my time if you refuse to do that.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then I guess you won’t convince me, because I read it and don’t understand. Suck to suck (for both of us) I guess

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Hamas bombed a hospital by mistake. War zones are dangerous.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

You're referring to the PIJ, not Hamas. And even the PIJ being responsible is very much in question at the moment as more information is obtained on those events. See the New York Times analysis from the other day.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know what NYT analysis you're referring to but this one by the BBC seems to support claims that the rocket was fired from within Gaza.

[-] V17@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No idea why you're downvoted, this is objectively true. One may consider it disgusting or morally indefensible, but a) unless Israel is lying about the presence of legitimate targets in the area it is not illegal b) using civilians as human shields is a staple Hamas tactic.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The truth is very hard to swallow. I served in Iraq and Afghanistan, I've witnessed this stupidity first hand. Terrorists are cowards who hide behind civilians. They want civilians to die because for every civilian killed they gain more bodies to their cause.

[-] Stanard@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

So so very close to piecing together why bombing a refugee camp even if there are terrorists or supporting infrastructure located there is a terrible idea.

I truly don't know how you can recognize that Hamas wants civilians to die because it will strengthen their numbers, and still excuse the bombing of civilians. Perhaps you're just trolling?

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago

I served in Iraq and Afghanistan

This explains so much about all the shit you're smearing all over Lemmy. You just miss murdering Arabs.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I am an engineer, I built schools, hospitals, and other public services. Few military personnel serve in combat roles.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

Oh, so you're just keeping your role of whitewashing a brutal occupation going then.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I don't support either side of the conflict.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

Yet you're only justifying one side's actions.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I don't support either side. Both sides have made no effort towards diplomacy. Both sides have focused on violence.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

Sure, if your knowledge of the conflict only goes back a month.

[-] Ya_Boy_Skinny_Penis@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Lol and you get downvoted because you're not meeting the bloodthirsty soldier narrative that Lemmy's unemployed communists love to parrot.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You're probably correct. I'm rather antiwar and pro diplomacy.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, I've heard the US operation in Iraq was very successful in defeating the Taliban. Oh wait...

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The Taliban are in Afghanistan and the U.S. mission was never against them, ever. Perhaps you should look up basic information first.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, was Iraq justified with Saddam's "weapon's of mass destruction" that didn't exist? Sorry, got my lies mixed up.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Iraq was GWB wanting to make his daddy proud. On the ground things were fine until his dumbass fired the entire Iraqi military. That's when it all went to hell. It did lead to a United Iraq, but it took 12 years.

[-] wryan@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I can't help but parrot exactly what @V17 said. People just don't want to hear the realities of war.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
717 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2530 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS