333

“He and his family deserved better,” the Innocence Project of Florida said in a statement. “Lenny’s life mattered.”

Cure’s quest to rebuild his life after being wrongfully convicted in 2003 ended tragically on the shoulder of Interstate 95 in South Georgia on Monday morning.

On Wednesday, the Camden County, Georgia, sheriff’s office released body-worn and dash camera videos of the moments leading up to the shooting.

In the dash cam video, the deputy begins pursuing Cure with his sirens on after Cure’s vehicle passes his. The pursuit lasts about one minute and 20 seconds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PrinceHabib72@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago

The article says Cure was going at 100 MPH for 80 seconds after the officer put on his lights. Cure pulled over in the end, but that doesn't mean it's not a chase, which is why the cop ordered him out so quickly. 100 MPH is already more than just a speeding ticket, that's reckless endangerment. In general, 15 MPH above the speed limit is considered reckless. Add that to the chase, and that's why Cure was under arrest rather than just a ticket. I agree with you, the cop did nothing wrong here. He gave lawful orders, escalated force reasonably, attempted both his taser and his baton before firing as a last resort when he began to lose the fight and his own life became threatened, and administered first aid immediately.

[-] Ejh3k@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I've been pulled over for going faster than 100mph. 103 to be exact. Didn't get arrested. It's 100% at the officer's discretion.

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

A couple of years ago, I was listening to music in earbuds and didn’t notice cop tucked in behind me for a couple of miles, while doing 126 on a motorcycle with some of the baffles removed. Because I’m of the Eddie Haskell phenotype, I only got dinged for 85 and the cop even stuck around for a few minutes to chat about the bike.

One of the reasons I’m solidly ACAB is that I almost never get popped for tickets, and when I do, they’re always knocked down by the cop to de minimis charges. Of the tens of times I’ve been stopped since the late-‘70s, I’ve eaten maybe six total tickets. Cops aren’t fair.

[-] Ejh3k@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I got dropped from 103 in a 70 to 79. Cop asked me why I was speeding, and I truthfully told him that it was a beautiful day, had good tunes going, and was just in a great mood and didn't realize I was going that fast. He was a marked state trooper that was driving with traffic and I blew right past him.

I rarely get tickets because I have veteran plates and a veteran drivers license, most cops just give me a warning. Got stopped three times in one day trying to get out of Texas, all warnings. Last cop of the day gave me a weather forecast. I guarantee if I wasn't a white dude with vet affiliations I would get way more tickets. Cops aren't fair.

[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Funny, I've only been pulled over once on my bike, and I was just keeping up with traffic, which was going 80 to be fair... But he claimed I was going 97, so I had to go to court, where he lied his ass off to the judge, and I had to eat a $400 ticket plus whatever it did to my insurance... and I'm very white too, if I wasn't, who knows what that piece of shit might have done.

[-] PrinceHabib72@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

Did you also flee, though? That's the other thing. He kept driving for well over a minute before finally pulling over. That was the reason for the arrest, and then when he resisted arrest, only then did the officer escalate.

[-] phx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

How long did it take you to pull over after you got lit up?

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

100 MPH is already more than just a speeding ticket, that's reckless endangerment.

No it's not. Here's the proof.

[-] LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

You technically correct which is the best kind of correct, it’s not automatic. There is evidence to suggest that in general the 30 mph over the limit would have resulted in a reckless driving arrest.

Either way whether it would have been has nothing to do with how the situation played out.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Do you have a link to that evidence? I'd be interested in seeing it.

[-] LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Here’s the legal precedent. Travis v, State

There’s anecdotal evidence as well.

https://getjerry.com/questions/how-fast-is-considered-reckless-driving-in-technically

https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/qap7u1/got_2_traffic_tickets_speeding_and_reckless/

https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/9egs7j/ga_speeding_and_reckless_driving/

There’s also evidence that they don’t always determine reckless driving at high speeds, especially when targeting for that en masse it seems.

https://www.wsaz.com/2023/06/14/dozens-drivers-were-caught-going-over-100-mph-georgia-interstate-police-say/?outputType=amp

It’s really officer discretion based on the wording of their reckless driving law. Either way, as I said, whether it would have been or not doesn’t matter in regards to how this stop played out.

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That doesn't prove that it isn't considered reckless driving. Excessive speeding is reckless driving. They haven't put an exact number to it and the statute is vague but this lawyers page tries listing some examples.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

The link I provided is clear ... if on an interstate highway he'd had to have been going 35 mph over the speed limit for charges to be applied. He was going 30 mph over so he should have been issued a $500 ticket and a court date (as further fines could be assessed by a judge).

The cop murdered him with exactly zero cause. A classic #ACAB.

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If 85mph counts as a super speeder, how do you think they view going 100mph? Also your link does say:

Depending on the circumstances, a speeding violation can lead to a "reckless driving" conviction.

It's not like not doing more than 34mph over exempts you from reckless driving when doing 100mph. No where does it say you have to be doing 35mph over for that.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nowhere does it say you have to be doing 35mph over for that.

Yes it does ... here.

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Quote the part that says that for me. I'm not finding it.

[-] PrinceHabib72@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

He also fled and resisted arrest. Both arrestable offenses. If he would have promptly pulled over, it would almost certainly have been a citation at worst. He fled at 100 MPH for over a minute before finally pulling over. Also, how is an officer being choked out on the side of the highway defending himself with a taser, then a baton (while actively being strangled and bent nearly backwards), and only THEN a gun, "zero cause"?

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

A whole minute?? Wow! That like OJ's high speed chase.

/s

[-] PrinceHabib72@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Any fleeing is still fleeing. I don't understand why you think this was an unjustified shooting. He was putting every other driver at risk, refused lawful orders, and threatened the officer's life while saying "Yeah bitch, yeah bitch." Not exactly a paragon of humanity here.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

No one in their right mind believes that anyone who is being pulled over for speeding deserves to die because the cop is a murdering sob.

If you believe that, fine. We're done here.

[-] PrinceHabib72@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Give the full video a watch. It may change your mind.

https://youtu.be/tGNIAozOIok?si=957m9XDvuYryhM5D

[-] PrinceHabib72@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

But you didn't establish that he's a murdering son of a bitch. Did you actually watch the video you posted? All of it? Cure wasn't "pulled over for speeding", that's insanely reductive to the facts. He was going over 100 and refused to pull over for over a minute for no clear reason. In addition, when he refused to obey lawful orders and allow himself to be placed under arrest, he further escalated the situation. When he attempted to inflict severe bodily harm on the officer while taunting him, I'd say the shooting is extremely justified, especially when you consider the fact that the officer only fired after deploying two separate non-lethal methods to subdue Cure. He didn't deserve to die for speeding. I'd say he somewhat deserved it when he attempted severe bodily harm on the officer, though.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

A Black man is dead because he was speeding.

A cop murdered him.

[-] PrinceHabib72@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

A black man is dead because he was speeding, evaded the police, resisted arrest, and assaulted the officer.

A cop defended himself.

There you go, I fixed it for you.

[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

He literally had his hands around the police officers neck.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

After the cop escalated shit way beyond what it needed to be.

The fuck a traffic stop for a speeding ticket should become a cop murdering yet another Black man.

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe black guys shouldn't be out there acting like violent thwacked out psychopaths?

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
333 points (100.0% liked)

News

23268 readers
2370 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS