608
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

If the polling is this wacky, why bother publishing it at all?

Over the weekend, ABC and the Washington Post published the results of a poll that made both operations look like its results were the product of a month-long exercise with a Magic 8-Ball. The way you know it was an embarrassment is the Post story about the poll began by telling us all we should probably ignore it completely.

The Post-ABC poll shows Biden trailing Trump by 10 percentage points at this early stage in the election cycle, although the sizable margin of Trump’s lead in this survey is significantly at odds with other public polls that show the general election contest a virtual dead heat. The difference between this poll and others, as well as the unusual makeup of Trump’s and Biden’s coalitions in this survey, suggest it is probably an outlier.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 188 points 1 year ago

It was done entirely by phone. What person under, say, 60 answers an unknown call on their phone at this point? And if they left a voicemail to call them back, who would trust it? Basically, they're getting extremely gullible people (i.e. mostly Trump voters) to respond to the poll.

I think the only way you can do successful polling at this point is focus groups with carefully selected demographics, and I would even be dubious there.

[-] MetalJewSolid@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 year ago

I participated in a few polls in 2020 and…yeah. I would pick them up because I was waiting for important calls. Why tf else would I pick up. I still get these calls sometimes, usually while waiting for a call back for a job.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Even if I did pick up the phone, which I doubt I would, I would think it was a scam.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You guys are answering the unknown caller? Wow.

Why? Like, don’t.

[-] semi_sentient@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Every time I get a call from an unknown number I let it stop ringing and immediately add it to the block list. I imagine I can’t be the only one that does this.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Being on the job hunt is miserable. Is it a scammer? Is it a bill collector? Is it the job I applied to? They all start the conversation by asking me who I am instead of telling me who they are (you know, the normal thing you do when you are the initiator of the call), so if I pop off on them thinking it's the bill collector for the 3rd time today with a different number, and it's the job, I've lost myself the opportunity.

[-] semi_sentient@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

You definitely have my sympathies. Best of luck on the job hunt. I hope you find something great.

[-] ShunkW@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I was waiting to hear back about a job then and answered a poll call about gambling. I very, very rarely gamble. And when I do it's like $50 on blackjack or something cuz my friends want to go to the casino here. That was a fun call cuz my answers were like "never", *rarely", "no". Lol

Dunno why I felt the need to share. I'm still drunk from my friends birthday party last night I think lol

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

What if it was the employer calling to see if you gamble?

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds like they gave good answers, unless they were applying to a casino.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

I've answered a poll about food security once when I was in Belgium. They were asking if goes many mean I'd skipped in the last month, if hunger was affecting my studies or work, if u was able to have vegetables or fruits in my diet ...

I answered until the end because it just felt sad, I'm privileged and don't have to worry about these issues but I wanted people working on the issue to have all the support needed.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

It should also be said that polls are only responded to by people who a) have the time, and b) have something to say.

B alone is enough to make the respondents select for far more extreme than the average person. A also selects for… people who’ve got nothing else going on.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

After watching The Telemarketers, I'm even less inclined to pick up the phone than ever. And it was already at the "almost never" point.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe. I'd still wonder if that was a scam and probably not reply.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Seriously a random text from “ABC News” asking for a response? Um, no. Not in a million years. That stuff is for batshit morons who don’t know a . . . ahhhh, right.

[-] HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Serious: why wouldnt you answer an unknown number?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Because it's very likely a scam or someone trying to sell me something. What is the advantage of answering one?

[-] HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I do sometimes get important calls from some gov. office or something like that. As a example, I lost my wallet and a about a week later the office in charged of the found-lost things called to say someone had found it and I could pick it up.

But to be fair I only ever got 1 scam call and most people I know got the same one (Europolice scam last year)

Like, where I live scam/sell calls are just not a thing, so might be regional.

Buy yeah, thanks for the answer, I get you point now.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Europe may be different, but I get a good 12-14 probably scam/spam calls a week here in the U.S. I can tell because they're never in an area code I'm familiar with or one from a place where I moved away from and don't know anyone anymore.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
608 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS