344
submitted 1 year ago by kworpy@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chozo@kbin.social 286 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is misleading. Not sure if by ignorance or malice, but it's very misleading.

This isn't happening with your browser bookmarks. This is Google Collections, which is a shareable bookmarking feature, meaning it can be made publicly available. That's why it's moderated. It's basically Google's version on something like Pinterest.

https://www.androidpolice.com/create-google-collections/

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 year ago

Even so - it's not an excuse meddle with it, whatever you call it. Fuck Google.

[-] Sneptaur@pawb.social 79 points 1 year ago

You should be mad about the things google does. I don’t think this particular thing is unreasonable though.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago
[-] darcmage@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

If you're going to store something on someone else's computer (Google cloud), they have every right to control what is and is not allowed on their systems. Don't like it? Use encryption, selfhost, etc...

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

I would love to hear that from Google's spokesperson.

[-] hh93@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

So if you have a collection with political targets and the folder is just google maps links to their houses with their names as the bookmark name google shouldn't be allowed to stop you from spreading this?

Sure google is shitty but this feature is designed to share links with other people and sometimes those links can be dangerous so imho it's absolutely necessary to moderate them at some level.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Depends if it's illegal or not. In your case it's probably illegal.

[-] hh93@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

In that case they deleted a link to illegal content in their jurisdiction - so should be fine - shouldn't it?

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

IMO defending Google is the underhanded move.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 year ago

Sharing misleading info means people are less likely to believe you on real issues.

Firefox IS better, Chrome's meddling IS a problem. We don't need to make stuff up in favor of that, and clarifying the point isn't "defending Google"

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

DAE GOOGLE BAD???

I don't give a fuck if you like Google or not, but spreading misleading FUD is the real underhanded move.

There are plenty of valid reasons to be critical of Google. This ain't one.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

IMO targeting someone you don't like with antipathy regardless of their actions is a sociopathic move.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
344 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31921 readers
509 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS