961
war, war never rules (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago by TotallynotJessica to c/onehundredninetysix
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 2 points 1 month ago

Would the world be better off today if people fought the Nazis earlier and not only when it threatened their imperialism and no one used it to further their imperialism? Yes. But that wasn't what we were discussing.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

All you're doing here is dodging the question.

[-] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, I answered your question.

Edit: I can be more clear.

Is it good someone stopped the Nazis from genocide? Yes.

Did armed resistance to the Nazis from state military start because of the genocide? No.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Did armed resistance to the Nazis from state military start because of the genocide? No.

OK. But that's not what I asked, is it?

The question is simple; would the world be better off if no one had engaged in armed resistance to the Nazis. Why they did it - the exact specifics of a complex sea of motivations - is beside the point.

Arguing that we should just not have a military is arguing that the world should have just let the Nazis take over. It's that simple. It's not about good and bad, it's about what's necessary. Reality does not care about your moral purity.

[-] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 1 points 1 month ago

You may not have seen my edit:

Is it good someone stopped the Nazis from genocide? Yes.

Did armed resistance to the Nazis from state military start because of the genocide? No.

Why countries entered WWII is critical to my position and key to how I view the ethics here. My position is that countries are happy to allow people to think they entered to war to stop the Holocaust because it buys them goodwill. If they can defend their new wars by saying "These guys are just like the Nazis, we are being liberators again!" people are less likely to push back.

This isn't about moral purity. I don't think violence is never justified. I am not aware of an example there a state started a war with another state to stop the killing of people because of their worldview, sexuality, or colour of their skin. That's it's. That's my whole statement.

Maybe you don't define military the same way I do (in that it has to be attached to a state). That's fine. I have no interest in arguing over the definition because it's a distraction from us understanding each other. We can just accept our definition is different (if that's the case).

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Is it good someone stopped the Nazis from genocide? Yes.

There we go. End of discussion.

I'm not here to debate the idea that wars are bad, or that they happen for complex, often highly immoral reasons. I never staked out any of those positions. In fact I literally said previously "There is no such thing as a perfectly moral war."

But none of that changes the fact that, like it or not, militaries are necessary. They're necessary because wars get started for immoral reasons. Because we can't wish ourselves into a world where autocrats and fascists and nationalists and revanchists don't exist. We can work to build that world, and we should. But it will take time, and we do not get the luxury of living without any means of stopping those people in the meantime.

You can't be a progressive nation if you're not a nation at all.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
961 points (100.0% liked)

196

6637 readers
1561 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS