309
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 27 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Reminds me of something about a big caliber handgun or something, I think a joke about the deagle for self-defense? :

"for when the intruder is hiding behind a fridge, behind the wall, in your neighbor's house"

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 6 points 8 hours ago

Sounds like Danny Vermin talking about his .88 Magnum in Johnny Dangerously:

"This goes through armor. And through the victim, through the wall, through a tree outside..."

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 15 points 13 hours ago

Pistols in general are not the best choice for home defense. Even 9mm dances through sheetrock and siding and stays dangerous. A shotgun with an 18.5" barrel and buckshot is as good as it gets. Very effective against humans, that's why they're a war crime, and damage to walls is typically pretty minimal.

Now if you're in woods with dangerous critters then a 1911 in .45 ACP or 10mm is the way to go IMHO.

Deagles are a bit over the top, but it sure is fun trying to keep ahold of it when it goes off.

[-] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Using a shotgun with buckshot isn’t a war crime..?

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago

I suppose I could be wrong on that, though I was sure I had read that at some point. Something to do with trench warfare, but whatev's. Still the best choice if you got baddies in your bungalow.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It was only the German position against the American trench gun in WW1, but never wide agreement:

On September 15, 1918, the German government officially protested the use of the shotgun in a note verbale—an unsigned diplomatic note—transmitted to the Spanish Embassy in Berlin, then to the Swiss Embassy, and eventually to the American legation in Berne, Switzerland. The note asserted that the use of shotguns by U.S. forces violated Article 23(e) of the 1899 and 1907 Hague Conventions and warned that any American captured with a shotgun or shotgun ammunition would be executed.
[...]
In his formal response to Germany’s protest, Secretary of State Lansing maintained that the shotgun the army used could not be the subject of “legitimate or reasonable protest” under the Hague Conventions.
[...]
In the 100 years since the protest, the U.S. government’s position with respect to the use of shotguns in wartime has never wavered. U.S. military forces used shotguns in World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and even in post-invasion Iraq (to clear out suspected insurgent hideouts in house-to-house fighting).

Source

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 13 minutes ago

Right on. Thank you for straightening me out on that.

[-] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I don’t disagree. However, definitely not a war crime.

Source: was infantry.

Tangentially, I disagree with your .45 or 10mm as well. Ballistics have come a long way and unless you need to defend from bears, the 9mm is wonderful, lighter, cheaper, and has a higher carry capacity.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 16 minutes ago

Feral hogs will take multiple 9mm bullets and still fuck you up, and bears as you mentioned definitely call for large caliber rounds. Big cats, nah fam, I want stopping power. Ballistics don't mean shit at defensive range. 9mm is fine for stopping the human animal, that's what it was designed for, but it's not enough when nature comes to say hello.

[-] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 minutes ago

That’s fair. I don’t live in hog territory, forgot those fuckers exist. I also wouldn’t take a 9 into hog territory.

[-] Fuckswearwords@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Aaah American jokes, hard to get unlike the home invader.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
309 points (100.0% liked)

196

6302 readers
2912 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS