198
Anon observes redditors (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] king_comrade@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

If it were a man fucking 1000 girls in a day, we'd all celebrate. What's more unattractive than a high body count? Insecurity.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

If it were a man fucking 1000 girls in a day, we'd all celebrate.

This statement makes me doubt that you know any actual human people irl.

[-] king_comrade@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

How are all of you so blind to not see the obvious double standard. Many men have been celebrated for their promiscuity and even their sinister actions. Trump is one of these men and managed to win the US election twice. It's worth celebrating Bonnie blue for at least doing it for the hustle.

[-] AceOnTrack 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trump is celebrated for being a pedo and a cheat? What reality you live on?

The left is hounding everyone about how it makes him a shit person, and the right pretends it never happened in order to not hurt his image.

There's nothing worth celebrating in a person deciding that fucking 1000 people in a day is a life goal

[-] king_comrade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

He blatantly gloats about his lifestyle and while today he's shy about Epstein and young girls he certainly wasn't back on campaign in 2016. The point being that men receive a less critical eye regarding sexual promiscuity compared to women. I trust you get that and you're just being difficult to frustrate me. I'll let it pass.

[-] AceOnTrack 2 points 1 day ago

him being proud of being a pedo freak and a cheat doesn't mean he is being celebrated for it.

You're fucking insane if you think a guy fucking 1000 girls in a day as some sort of publicity stunt wouldn't be as mocked as the other way around.

[-] king_comrade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It wouldn't be talked about with as much controversy, no way. It certainly wouldn't have the same staying power that Bonnie's scene has managed.

[-] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Doesn't even seem physically possible...

[-] djsoren19 4 points 2 days ago

Not with that attitude!

I could probably suck a thousand cocks in a day. Maybe get a few of them with just hjs.

[-] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The theoretical maximum would be 4 hand jobs at once. Supposing one BJ and 4 HJs, and a generous 10 minutes per batch, you could, in theory, get up to 720 in 24 hour period. To get to 1000, you'd need to complete your batches in 7 minutes or less.

[-] djsoren19 3 points 2 days ago

Idk my head game is p strong. I bet I could cycle through each group of four in 5 minutes.

Maybe put some porn or something on in the background for the guys so I'm not trying to work them up from nothing.

My biggest worry would honestly just be food and water. I'm a prissy bitch when I haven't eaten and idk if horny me is strong enough to power through. If anything would stop me from getting through all thousand in 24 hours, it'd probably be the french fry break.

[-] king_comrade@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If we're only counting penetration, it ain't that wild

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

All? Nah, I'd be wearing PPE and calling a health department to give people STD tests and see if a super spreader event just happened, regardless of sex, gender, or orientation.

No way the condoms are having a 100% success rate at the number in a single 24 hours.

[-] king_comrade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yep that's right, orgies and sex parties are notorious for diseases. There's no way the exact opposite is true and you're a lazy bigot who couldn't be more clever insulting pro sex communities. Crack another joke jester, but maybe try this time yeh?

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yep that's right, orgies and sex parties are notorious for diseases.

I mean, yeah?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4714774/ (Increased levels of Gonorrhea in certain models of MSM)

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-021-05813-5 (Increased odds of STIs in cis/bi swingers)

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3410442/ (Higher odds of transmission in an orgy, and that's just based on self reporting - actual transmission numbers are higher)

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100623212635.htm (Much higher increased rates of STIs among elderly swinger/group sex communities)

These are just some statistics proving that, even though basic damn logic and math would normally lead a person of basic levels of intelligence to conclude that the logistics of such events would increase the odds of STIs spreading; much like a person with the flu sneezing in a plane, even with a mask, is more likely to infect others than 2 people in an open field - but I understand providing empirical data is important still.

Note that none of these events involved anywhere close to a 1001 people in a single day. Which means the odds would be much higher with that many people in involved, as screening that many people fully would be both expensive and more difficult to do in an organized manner, and the odds of a condom slip or other protective measure failing would only go up.

But by all means, do keep talking and showing everyone your magnificent grasp on basic statistical logic.

[-] king_comrade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That wasn't a good joke at all. Completely ignored what I asked. So rude.

this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
198 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

8243 readers
1017 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS