972
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] starik@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

There are many contradictory opinions on why Harris lost. These opinions usually boil down to “Her policy positions weren’t close enough to my policy positions, and that’s why she lost.”

[-] prole 5 points 3 months ago

And every other leftist on this site seems to believe that she would have won, had she just pandered to them more. Completely ignoring the fact that leftism essentially doesn't exist in this country, and Lemmy isn't an accurate representation of American voters.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 13 points 3 months ago

Well, it's pretty obvious that running for the Liz Cheney voter did not work.

[-] starik@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

It’s hard to tell if allowing Cheney to campaign for her helped, hurt, or had very little impact at all. I suspect the latter, but we’ll never know because we can’t rerun the race.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 6 points 3 months ago

Again, looking at the 2024 race, it is obvious it did not work. Because she lost. And badly.

[-] starik@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

In that sense, everything she did “didn’t work.” Centrists will site her progressive policies as the culprit and say those didn’t work, because she didn’t win. The fact is, neither of you know what the but-for cause of her loss was, but you want to believe it was the one that serves your position.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

You did fall out of the coconut tree

[-] starik@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

lol good point

[-] prole 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, major miscalculation for sure

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago

Having seen it with Gore, Kerry, Obama (post win), Clinton, and now Harris, it's not a single mistake. The Dems would always prefer to lose to the right than win to the left.

Biden had COVID, so it's just outside the norm.

[-] prole 4 points 3 months ago

Right, because there is no proper left in this country, and Democrats are centrists who want to continue the status quo

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

Yup, and so they ratchet in what the right has done. As the status quo is not a static thing.

[-] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 3 points 3 months ago

Meanwhile 5 minutes later you'll be blaming the Gaza non-voters for her losing without a hint of self-awareness.

this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
972 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30930 readers
1635 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS