651
I'm so tired (lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They did in 2020, and then they did nothing to prevent fascism. The fascist did not face serious detrimental consequences of any kind. In fact they actively coveted and aided Israeli fascist which harmed their ability to get reelected.

[-] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago

Did Biden win the senate? Did he appoint the judges for the supreme court? I agree that he mishandled the conflict in Israel, but I not sure what Biden could have done to stop the abolishment of Roe v Wade as an example. If anything, he did a good job bringing us back to some sense of stability after Trump's 1st term ended in disaster. We should critize the Democrats for their mismanagement in that goal, but this consensus that Republicans and Democrats are exactly the same I've been seeing everywhere is ridiculous. It's a false equivalence fallacy

[-] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did Biden win the senate?

It seems that now that Trump is president, what congress says doesn't matter at all and the President can do whatever.

Did he appoint the judges for the supreme court?

He could've expanded it, like FDR threatened to do and forced the court to let him do some of the New Deal reforms they were previously opposed to. Biden never lifted a finger with regards to that. This also could've maintained Roe v Wade.

I agree that he mishandled the conflict in Israel,

  1. it's a genocide
  2. "mishandled" is a really egregious weasel word for "gave unconditional support to the government even as approval ratings slid down the drain"
[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The problem is if Biden had done this everything he did would have been struck down why it works for Trump is because Republican Congress doesn't stand up or have a spine when it's a Republican leader

You're literally dragging Democrats through the mud for the fact that Republicans won't hold each other accountable

Now don't get me wrong there's a lot Democrats need to be held accountable for but I just want it to be things that they earned

[-] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

So the Democratic Party is structurally incapable of pushing through the reforms and new programs that are necessary to stop fascism? Why should people keep being married to that party instead of supporting any other effort, and pay no rhetorical support nor lip service to a party that also facilitates fascism?

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago

The democrats didn't have to play by trump's rules, but they had to dismantle the foundations he had put in place during his term. I mean, they didn't even strengthen rules to avoid another Jan 6th. Didn't protect the freedom of the press. Didn't strengthen campaign finance laws. Didn't approach voting reform. Didn't ban gerrymandering. Nothing.

Democratic politicians (as opposed to Democrat Party politicians) seem to think you defeat the other side by winning elections, but it's impossible to win all the elections. At some point you lose, and all you've got left is your systematic safeguards to keep your democracy. You must bolster the safeguards while you can, even if it might work against you in the short term.

[-] pinto@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Now don’t get me wrong there’s a lot Democrats need to be held accountable for but I just want it to be things that they earned

They earn our vote when they aren't shitheels for fascists.

[-] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I'm curious by your last statement if you have a problem with Democrat candidates should have to earn a vote from us.

[-] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Trump has been doing everything via executive orders which is why he has been able to bypass everything. I do agree that executive orders need to be nerfed if we ever get out of this mess. The problem with Democrats is that they play by the rules and Republicans don't, thus why Biden never spammed executive orders. Though it might all come back to haunt Trump eventually since there's thousands of lawsuits filed against him for all the times he misused executive orders. That's just wishful thinking on my part though.

"Mishandled" was perhaps oversimplifying a little too hard, but it's not like the genocide was strictly committed by the Biden Administration. Biden's sin was only making a public statement for Israel to "improve the humanitarian conditions in Gaza" and then continuing to send military aid anyway.

[-] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Though it might all come back to haunt Trump eventually since there’s thousands of lawsuits filed against him for all the times he misused executive orders. That’s just wishful thinking on my part though.

He'll die before any of those consequences matter. His fascist successor will probably rinse the next Democratic nominee because the Democrats don't intend to change anything or make any of the changes you're talking about happen. It's a million times more realistic to hope that the United States splits into multiple incoherent territories that are no longer able to terrorize the rest of the world than hope the Democratic Party suddenly turns around and become the opposite of what it has been during essentially its whole existence (maybe except for the minute that Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights act).

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My problem is not with the individual my issue is with the deomcratic party. You are correct that there wasn't anything Biden could actually do on his own. It would take a collective effort and likely military cooperation. It would cause political mayhem and be detrimental to the country as a whole and possibly destroyed the democratic party. It could prevent fascism though. I'm not saying any of this is easy or legal but it could have prevented fascism. Instead they did nothing of consequence.

I am personally of the opinion that fascism is incapable of being prevented through official means under capitalist liberal democracy so everything I say here is effectively meaningless. I'm sort of arguing that people in a system incapable of stopping fascism should have just done it anyway. Point is, you either have to accept that the democrats did nothing to stop fascism or that capitalist liberal democracy is incapable of stopping it and should be abandoned. Assuming you agree that the Trump administration is fascist.

You would probably refer to me as an authoritarian yeah but I think the term is meaningless. As far as I'm concerned all states are authoritarian and my endgoal is the dissolution of all states.

Edit: Roe v Wade should have been codified far before they had the chance to dismantle it but the democrats used it like a carrot on a stick.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Contrary to popular belief, Biden (as president,) was in fact Garlands boss.

Yes? The president is supposed to be fairly hands off, but when you have an FBI director who thinks it’s perfectly acceptable to wait a year until there’s a special prosecutor to get some of our most sensitive documents back, it’s probably well past time to ask him to resign and get someone who’ll do the damn job.

[-] mmcintyre@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I guess Democratic presidents only ever nominating Republicans to be head of the FBI was a bad idea.

[-] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Damn, the good cop just keep stumbling into all these bad ideas! I feel bad for them 😕

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Yes, they had both chambers of the house for the first part of his presidency.

Also, yes he appointed a scotus judge and a few others, but he didn’t pack the courts like he could have, and dems in both houses did fuck all to stop Trump or even solidify the voting rights act (which is now in the shadow docket chopping block.)

Jan 6 was basically our version of the beer hall putsch.

And fuck everyone who said I was wrong about that.

[-] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 5 points 1 month ago

they did nothing to prevent fascism. The fascist did not face serious detrimental consequences of any kind.

That is the trumpiest and scariest line of thinking possible. Elections are not meant to punish the losing side.

The very fact the Dems won in an election is a demonstration that they weren't battling fascists yet.

This is crazy dumb.

[-] Capable_Coping@piefed.social 23 points 1 month ago

The very facy the Dems won in an election is a demonstration that they weren't battling fascists yet.

Trump and crew literally attempted to overturn the election and the Dems did next to nothing. If we can't recognize fascist actors before they've fully seized control of government then we will never have effective resistance to these types of movements.

[-] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Trump and crew literally attempted to overturn the election and the Dems did next to nothing

Are you forgetting how almost everyone who stormed the Capitol was arrested?

Politically, they Impeached trump and only craven Republicans saved him.

The rest is supposed to be on the voters, more than half of whom decided they were okay with what had happened. As is their unfortunate democratic right, that's literally how it works.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Useless pawns. The man who organized it is now POTUS

[-] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Like I said:

Politically, they Impeached trump and only craven Republicans saved him.

You know what could have given trump problems? More Dems in the Senate either time he was Impeached!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

To be clear: they didn't convict because he was leaving office in a few days anyway. because there was no need for a political solution when the doj can just do what it exists to do.

there was no need to impeach him at that point.

Hey, you know, it might be political if you don't suck trump off.

Maybe you should get on that. wouldn't want to be political.

(Fun fact, not doing something because it might be political is a political act, coward.)

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

They weren't the losing side, they were the side that committed crimes. Punishing criminals for their crimes isn't a step too far. The mere fact that wealthy powerful people are not punished for their crimes is the fucking problem. That's not a feature of democracy. That's a failure of democracy.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

That is the trumpiest and scariest line of thinking possible. Elections are not meant to punish the losing side.

The department of justice is supposed to enforce the laws of this country.

And yes, you fucking coward, that includes arresting, trying and convicting an insurrectionist leader who tried to take over our country.

Now go ahead, explain how that’s “political” and why we can’t have justice.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fascist should not be treated the same as a normal political opponent. You NEED to purge them from your government as soon as possible. You can spot proto-fascists, it is possible. Why in gods green earth would you wait until they have established power to challenge them, that's stupid as hell. I'm sorry if it disturbs your liberal sensibilities but fascists deserve to be oppressed. They won't hesitate to oppress you when they get power

[-] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, everyone can call anyone a fascist. That's the entire problem.

Any system wherein one group can just dismantle another because of their politics will be abused. If whatever magical law/mechanism your nonsense required existed and had been used after the 2020 election, trump's successor would simply have done the same thing to the Democrats next time but we'd be even worse off as there would be no constraints on their power and no viable opposition, unlike the Dems who now stand a Puncher's chance in the goddamn Senate.

Being the good guy is difficult but the road you propose inexorably leads to authoritarianism.

I get that politics is slow and boring but this isn't a video game.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pacifism is not a virtue in and of itself. These people are going to murder me and the people who are supposed to prevent that have done nothing of value. I'm sorry your precious liberal values stop you from defending yourself. If liberal democracy can do nothing to prevent fascism then liberal democracy should be replaced.

my other commentMy problem is not with the individual my issue is with the deomcratic party. You are correct that there wasn't anything Biden could actually do on his own. It would take a collective effort and likely military cooperation. It would cause political mayhem and be detrimental to the country as a whole and possibly destroyed the democratic party. It could prevent fascism though. I'm not saying any of this is easy or legal but it could have prevented fascism. Instead they did nothing of consequence.

I am personally of the opinion that fascism is incapable of being prevented through official means under capitalist liberal democracy so everything I say here is effectively meaningless. I'm sort of arguing that people in a system incapable of stopping fascism should have just done it anyway. Point is, you either have to accept that the democrats did nothing to stop fascism or that capitalist liberal democracy is incapable of stopping it and should be abandoned. Assuming you agree that the Trump administration is fascist.

You would probably refer to me as an authoritarian yeah but I think the term is meaningless. As far as I'm concerned all states are authoritarian and my endgoal is the dissolution of all states.

Edit: Roe v Wade should have been codified far before they had the chance to dismantle it but the democrats used it like a carrot on a stick.

for added detail

I understand not wanting to do violence, trust me I do. I hope I never have to hurt anyone in my life, so far I haven't done so physically or on purpose. It does need to be done though. We are having violence done to us and it is okay to respond violently.

[-] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago

You would probably refer to me as an authoritarian yeah

You are correct

And the answer to rising fascism is not trying to replace a popular authoritarian with an unpopular one.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

I agree, the goal would be the authority of workers to be popular first.

[-] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago

No idea what you're trying to say.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, everyone can call anyone a fascist. That's the entire problem.

Its not. There are actual academic definitions for what a fascist is. Calling someone a fascist doesn't mean they meet any of the criteria.

Just because a fascist hasn't been completely successful left that doesn't mean they're not a fascist. Trump literally staged an insurrection. The fuck bullshit is this.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
651 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

11835 readers
1318 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS