317
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 35 points 1 week ago

The mental gymnastics people need to do to feel better about getting something for free against the wishes of the creator is so wild.

Just own it.

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 32 points 1 week ago

It's not always against the wishes of the creators. It's certainly against the wishes of whoever is making money out of it, and fair enough this is sometimes the creator but more often than not we are talking about a middleman, such as a publisher or big entertainment company.

When I see piracy is depriving the creator of revenue directly, it always feels bad to me.

When I see the creatives have been paid already, or have several income streams (and big ones at that too) and the only ones deprived of profit are the middleman companies.... Well...

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 7 points 1 week ago

All of this is overthinking to try and justify it to yourself.

[-] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

Seems like you are doing a lot of overthinking to argue against piracy on the piracy community

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 5 points 1 week ago

When did I argue against piracy? My 28TB array of shows and movies begs to differ.

[-] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago
[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 5 points 1 week ago

You okay, lil bro?

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

Yeah, "the wishes of the creator" don't matter. They don't get to dictate how people use an idea they've shared, no matter how elaborate. If they want to keep it private, then don't share it.

[-] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

Surely, as in most modern games, the creators exact wishes is that nobody will be able to play it in a few years ...

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Well yes of course, we can't have the poor's playing games years after their made!! That loses us shareholder quarterly value!! They must buy a new game yearly. Thats why we make everything online only so we can shut servers down at will, are you new in this industry?

Thats why we are going after emulation next. Can you imagine, poor's with access to millions of games 20-30 years old, with no subscription fees? The horror!!!

[-] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

You shall not own anything

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 3 points 1 week ago
[-] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

Stupidest comment of the week

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 1 week ago

Another great point by one of the greatest minds of our generation

[-] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

What else should I say when you use "weird" as a counterargument? That's not rational, replying with a rational point doesn't make sense.

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 1 week ago

You didn't make a coherent argument in the first place... What am I supposed to counter, exactly?

[-] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

Dude log off already, others are having zero trouble getting what I meant

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 1 week ago

Whatever you need to tell yourself, lil bro

[-] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 8 points 1 week ago

I love Warren Ellis's run of Moon Knight. The art, the writing, the themes, it's so good. It was only after I recommended it on MULTIVERSE that I was informed Warren Ellis is an asshole. He cheated on dozens of women at the same time, giving them career favours in exchange for sex. It was a sexually exploitative relationship that the women were not made aware of in advance.

Good thing I didn't pay for it!

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 4 points 1 week ago

I've always meant to read some Moon Knight, is that a good place to start?

[-] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 6 points 1 week ago

Yes, everyone agrees that Ellis's run from 2014 is the best Moon Knight made in the last 45 years. You can find it in the From The Dead book, which you shouldn't pay for because Ellis is a creepo.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I just assume all creators of things I enjoy will eventually be proven to be sex pests. It makes it much easier to justify piracy morally to myself. (/j)

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah because corpo ai slop bots asked the "wishes of the creator" before they outright stole everything.

Hardddddd eyeroll.

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 1 week ago

Did you reply to the wrong person?

[-] maddie1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

My favorite is people who use “archival purposes” as an argument for having a dump of some shit like SMB + Duck Hunt cart for NES. That shit isn’t going anywhere man, you just want to play it for free and that’s ok.

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
317 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

68904 readers
79 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS