540
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

He says other nations will have to guard and police the Strait of Hormuz as necessary, after his attacks on the country prompted Iran to target vessels in the crucial world shipping lane. Mark Stone analyses the Truth Social post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

The nationality of the ships isn't important.

Anyway, Iran won't keep antagonizing the entire world if their existence isn't at risk. They haven't been acting like crazy.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago

The nationality of the ships isn't important.

It is; Iranian, Indian and Chinese shipping, among others, is being allowed through the straits. Also you're right, but as long as America gets to just bomb them at any moment their existence is at risk, so they'll want some kind of guarantee this won't happen again.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

If it's closed to the US, the ships that go there will just register at Malaysia or whatever.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago

Remember the Houthi blockade? It's not that simple.

[-] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Iran ain't stupid. Most ships aren't registered under the flag of the nations they haul to anyway.

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

Nationality matters. Didn't India negotiate passage for their ships? I can imagine Iran will happily let ships through from countries that cut ties with the US. Don't host US bases, don't use dollars to pay for oil. That sort of thing.

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe allowing any country's ships through except the us ships would be better.
It shows that Iran is open to some form of conversation or negotiation whilst also saying to the us that their war starting shit won't be tolerated.
And to come back in 12-15 years after there's been a few different presidents to see if they've changed their warmongering ways. (<-- Haha, yeah)

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The problem is no one registers their ships from their actual country. There are a few countries that everyone registers their ships to, so it's not quite as simple as that, there are hidden paper trails connecting many of these boats to their true owners.

Liberia, Panama, and the Marshall Islands are the bigger ones.

[-] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Backing off means allowing Israel/US to do this again in the future. I don't think they're done yet especially since their Supreme Leader got assassinated by the US.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

I still want to know why Iran had it's supreme leader and all the other high ups in a vulnerable location knowing this was going to break out into war. Some said maybe the supreme leader wanted to be a martyr, ok, but why was everyone else that was there there? Including the son of the supreme leader. Something stinks about this, Idk what, but there is some fuckery afoot.

[-] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You dropped your tin foil hat buddy.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

How do you figure that? The supreme leader, his son, and military higher ups gathered at the ayatollah's compound knowing Israel and the US were going to attack, and knowing Israel wanted to assassinate the Supreme Leader in the prior war.

One would have to be quite dishonest or slow to not question why they decided to gather there then, and the newspapers did ask that very question, including the guardian.

So frankly, your critique says a lot about your own quality.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Their existence is at risk as long as the US has military bases in the region.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
540 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55432 readers
3851 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS