351
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 26 points 4 months ago

Those who literally deny the existence of the massacre in the Tiananmen Square, claiming that "nobody was killed" (or far more rarely, unapologetically stating that if they were, then they deserved it). Basically far-left extremists that exist in a world of "alternative facts" just like conservatives, the common denominator being that and simping for authoritarian regimes.

Words like "consent" tend not to matter to those holding that ideology.

img

[-] Krono@lemmy.today 46 points 4 months ago

"Tankie" does not come from Tiananmen Square, that is a common misconception. The term "tankie" is 33 years older than the Tiananmen Square massacre.

It originated to describe people who supported the 1956 Soviet Union military intervention in Hungary. Stalin sent in a bunch of T-35 tanks to crush the Hungarian Revolution. He was successful, and thousands of people died in the process.

Ever since then, "tankie" has been used as a derogatory term against Stalinists, Marxist-Leninists, communists, and leftists in general.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 months ago

To be fair, tanks seem to be a favored tool of these oppressive regimes. I'm personally not against communism, they have some good ideas like universal child care, guaranteed jobs, and housing (even though the latter may be considered sub-par by some). The problem comes when these fucking authoritarian cheerleaders come out and say communist governments were never oppressive.

[-] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The "oppression" you're referring to is confiscating the properties of bourgeois capitalists and landlords, and imprisoning them and their accomplices in case of resistance. This confiscation and appropriation by the state is what makes free, universal care and other social benefits possible. It's absurd to expect the features of communism without the policies behind them.

Also, the idea that authoritarian socialist governments just have a sadistic tendency to oppress and torture poor peasants is deeply unserious and a work of imagination created by western capitalist propaganda.

[-] belluck 13 points 4 months ago

The oppression they’re referring to is shooting at protestors wanting democratic reforms. The comment before that literally gives an example, the least you could do is look into it.

[-] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

First of all, socialist governments, like any other government, did not use force on protestors unless provoked by seditious behavior (i.e. coup attempt or political unrest), and only in proportion, which was the case in Hungary and in China. Stories about tanks crushing the bodies of protestors is fictitious. Also, the history of the Soviet Union, the PRC and other socialist polities is filled with workers protests that were left unaltered because they are a natural part in the process of building socialism. Thus, the idea that freedom of expression was inexistent under socialism is false, which leads me to my second point.

The claim that the riots in socialist states called for "democratic" reforms is the furthest thing from the truth. In the case of Hungary, the 1956 uprising was orchestrated by the Prime Minister in order to establish a capitalist multi-party system and restore the property of the big landowners after they were purged in the preceding decade and their industries nationalized by the state. If you consider this to be "democracy" then you cannot consider yourself to be a leftist.

I just realized what your name references, gtfo genocide enabler red fash belongs in the same pit as the regular fascists

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago

Ahh yes, the burgeois sailors of kronstadt.

[-] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago

300 communists were arrested and imprisoned by the Provisional Revolutionary Committee but hundreds of others escaped. The prison warden, Shustov, claimed to be an anarchist and planned to execute 23 Bolshevik prisoners, although the execution was prevented by the arrival of the Red Army.

The mutiny was supported by members of the White Army and British foreign minister George Curzon encouraged the Finnish government to intervene against the Bolsheviks.

On 17 March, the mutiny was defeated and Petrichenko ordered the crews of Sevastopol and Petropavlovsk to destroy their ships and go to Finland. The soldiers did not follow orders and arrested many members of the Provisional Revolutionary Committee. In May, Petrichenko went to Finland and joined the White Army under General Pyotr Wrangel.

Source.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 7 points 4 months ago

Extremists like to use "alternative facts" or whatever other tactics achieve their goals. The means does not matter to them, only the ends, which they feel self-righteously justifies anything to achieve.

And then separately from that, gullible people also exist too. It is a bias that we all could fall prey to, though some of us seem more on guard against it than others.

(Tbf, many of those claiming those alternative facts are quite aware of just how nonfactual they actually are - they simply do not care as power, rather than correctness, is all that there is to them.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I'm personally not against communism, they have some good ideas like universal child care, guaranteed jobs, and housing (even though the latter may be considered sub-par by some).

Tankies never seem to get that that part is not being critized, but the subversive of the movement by authoritarians.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Thats a really interesting bit of history, thank you for the additional context

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 months ago

The term mostly had been invoked by anti-authoritarian leftists derisively toward anyone who still supported the Soviet Union. In time, the usage generalized to apply broadly to authoritarian leftists, such as Marxist-Lenininsts (or Stalinists).

Now is it largely misused by liberals to designate anyone strongly critical of Western imperialism, which includes everyone from anarchists to campists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 months ago

I have so many questions. I guess I never viewed as "tankie" as left.

Hell, I consider myself far-left to the point of being a progressive, almost to the point of being an anarchist.

But my reality is rooted in actual facts.

[-] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 months ago

Note that the term "tankie" has become an anti-communist trope to demonize any person who's to the left of free universal healthcare.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago

I've been called a Tankie for saying Democrats should support popular policies to win elections they care about.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 months ago

Lmao is this all you post about?

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago

Yep, and then wonder why no one likes them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Basically far-left

we need a better topological geometry for these concepts, especially for these wacky edgecase fuckers like tankies. yeah, far left, like, you stand here, I'm going to move to your left until I've come around on the other side of the planet far far far far away left.

imho the vast majority of them are ccp click patriots waiting for the taiwan invasion to kick off.

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 21 points 4 months ago

Hehe, somebody was way ahead of you there...

img

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago
[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 6 points 4 months ago

It seems to work so well 😁

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 months ago

The framing of separating the "authoritarian left" from the actual left is basically accurate.

Why is "Far Left" marked as a trademark?

load more comments (37 replies)
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago

Tiananmen denial is hardly the only qualification for the term. That's an example of typical behavior, not the definition.

It's also far from the worst thing red fascists have done so it's just so weird how hard people focus on it. At least talk about gulags and kulaks sometimes, damn

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago

There literally just was not a massacre in Tiananmen, reporters from different countries were on location to witness it and said as much at the time, you are pushing US propaganda and accusing the people correcting you of not understanding consent based on absolutely nothing, you are either an incurable moron or a fed, embarrassing either way

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
351 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse memes

3199 readers
2 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
  5. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.
    • Addendum: Yes we know that you think ml/hexbear/grad are tankies and or .world are a bunch of liberals but it gets old quickly. Try and come up with new material.
  6. This is not the place to start flamewars between Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS