715
Food is literally rule (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 days ago

Lol without agriculture you would literally end up eating shit and dying.

Not true. Other ways to cultivate plentiful food that are not 'agriculture'; adjacent practices

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

No there aren't. Not at the scale that humanity currently exists. We would literally die even if we just couldn't make fertilizer. There would be no way to produce enough food for this many people.

Your mom isn't at the scale humanity currently exists!

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Real, this is a delusional slop post. All food requires some degree of labour, maintaining food supply or access to food requires even more labour.

Civilisation ≠ the natural human ecosystem, it's something we created... To feed ourselves.

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 5 points 4 days ago

every civilization around a large body of water makes this a half truth

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 12 points 4 days ago

Not really..... No major civilization around bodies of water subsists without agriculture. Fishing just supplements the protein requirements of the population, and unless they're fishing just mackle it's not likely to be sustainable.

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

true but major is doing some value lifting here

even though farming is credited with allowing for population density supporting civilization (tech, stratification etc) plenty of peoples subsisted on the coast for numerous generations prior

we’ve been a species much longer than we’ve had farming (30x?) not really fair to toss all that out just because there is no historical documentation

we have oral traditions arguably from before farming societies

but fish ponds off the coast supported relatively large populations in antiquity, just by then farming was also a thing so there was no reason not to do both

even though farming is credited with allowing for population density supporting civilization (tech, stratification etc) plenty of peoples subsisted on the coast for numerous generations prior

Generations prior to agriculture? I don't really see how that's relevant to the current conversation.

but fish ponds off the coast supported relatively large populations in antiquity, just by then farming was also a thing so there was no reason not to do both

Since the advent of agriculture grain, legumes, and vegetables have made up the vast majority of calories that have supported human life. Up until relatively recent times animal protein was a relatively small part of most people's diets.

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 days ago

if we managed to survive as a species for 30x our time vs farming we’re not going to eat shit a die

that was the point

bad faith argument, you can eat vegetables without farming, it just doesn't have the same population density, hence my point about ‘civilization’

but also not every culture skews that way, just humanity at large

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

major civilization

Going the fence a name doesn't make it not a fence.

I cannot opt out of being inside of fence, if I'm really lucky I might get to choose between a couple of them.

Anyone who misunderstands the issu, does so because they cannot accept their position as just another peon.

I actually like my job enough that the feeling of this meme is mostly background noise. I can still empathize because I have refused to allow the fences to beat it out of me. That is a never ending battle. It's a pity so many have lost the battle but I get it, that ignorance does look blissful.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

Fair, but fishing still requires a lot of work.

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

it can still be feast or famine but the ocean was once plentiful in many costal areas, pacific islands have some written history from sailors / explorers of some pretty great living conditions all things considered

won’t be for much longer

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
715 points (100.0% liked)

196

4997 readers
1840 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS