737
Owneruleship (media.piefed.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The image is not the NFT. How do people still not get it. You own the TOKEN not the image

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 118 points 2 days ago
[-] magic_smoke 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah you own a token which holds a copy of the link because storing image data on blockchain would be a fucking nightmare.

Entire things a gag.

Basically someone noticed you could make a crypto where each one holds unique to the blockchain data, and this is the best use they could make with it...

It makes me wonder what happens when one of these bag holders straight up no longer runs nodes, the few others who ran them follow, and no one is holding up the blockchain anymore. I guess someone could set up a new node, but would that temporary loss make it a new blockchain? Also they'd just be able to gank everyone's worthless tokens lol.

[-] tankfox@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

It's a bet, the current owners have wagered that the structure will exist long enough for someone else purchase it later at a higher price, under the auspice that they in turn will be able to pass this bag forward again later. Everyone actually involved knows there's no value to it OTHER then the record of previous sale prices and the line that keeps going up.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

...nobody's saying it's not worse

[-] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 days ago

That's..... That's the entire joke. Is that you don't own it.

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

No, NFTs are a joke but the post doesn't land

Jets flying low today then eh?

[-] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Oh yeah? If you own the token, show it to me. Hold it up in your hands. Show it to me fungibly.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean, I own a snow shovel but I have no way to prove it because I'm not at home and I don't have a photo of it.

I'm not saying blockchain is amazing, and I don't even think we'll put it to any good use (I mean it's been years), but the concept of property can be nebulous.

[-] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I was just talking shit about NFTs since they are specifically non-fungible. I have a dim view of them, and have yet to see a use case that couldn't be done more elegantly through account ownership, like owning a game on Steam for example. I know proponents like to argue that they own their token, and I don't own my games, but I feel like enacting laws over software ownership can fix that, where NFTs are fundamentally valueless without a company providing value. Like the Nascar mobile game NFTs that became worthless once the game was canceled. I own the token for a virtual car, but it now does nothing and has no value. And I wouldn't mind that, except for the fact that the lock chain is inherently resource intensive, so we wasted a lot of electricity and clean water to prove someone has a now useless Dale Earnhardt.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Well, I don't think having something in your steam library counts as owning it either, needs to be totally DRM-free and available if you or Steam is offline.

Agreed on the account ownership though, just a straightforward system that NFTs overcomplicate.

[-] lone_faerie 2 points 2 days ago

NFTs are useful in cases far removed from owning a jpeg. Things like supply chain, where each item is tied to an NFT, akin to a tracking number. You now have an immutable history of when and where each item is along every step of the supply chain

[-] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

But again, the computer that would go into that kind of a system is astronomical per item. It just doesn't make sense to use.

[-] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Only if you're talking about a Bitcoin-style public ledger blockchain. The auditable, immutable history can also make sense in a private blockchain that costs next to nothing to add to, can be backed up for a song, and can only be added to if you hold the private key.

[-] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I haven't heard of this implementation. Yeah, this 100% is viable.

[-] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Yet. That is the big reasoning behind proofs of chain like work, etc.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Well then go home, get your camera and your token, and show it to us. We can wait.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Hey buddy, I got the deal of a lifetime for you. As a one-time offer I'll sell you the Brooklyn Bridge for a never-before seen price.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think most people actually do understand the distinction at this point and just aren't impressed enough to care. Like wow, after my computer's PSU ignites and fries the whole rig into a charred cube, I still have the sales receipt for it... Big flex. Snapping photos of my gaming rig's sales receipt to impress my buddies on discord. Look at all this money I spent.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
737 points (100.0% liked)

196

4669 readers
1034 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS