1023
do what you love (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tux7350@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Don't ya think this might be a bit bias? They have a vested interest to sell you a philosophy degree.

[-] eestileib 11 points 17 hours ago

I used my philosophy of science classwork all the time in my engineering career.

What constitutes proof? What kinds of questions can you answer with data? When do we consider a pattern of behavior to represent the existence of some entity?

Being able to think about these kinds of questions with clarity is really helpful in diagnosing problems in large systems.

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 12 hours ago

What constitutes proof?

Statistical significance.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

I’ve worked with a few philosophy majors in various roles and they were more thoughtful about things. Like they learned how to think, not just what to think.

[-] Corngood@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago

What constitutes proof? What kinds of questions can you answer with data? When do we consider a pattern of behavior to represent the existence of some entity?

Any recommended reading for someone who's never formally studied philosophy?

[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Karl Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" is a seminal work in the modern philosophy of science. It proposes to solve the problem of induction, and his proposal of falsifiability is, to my knowledge, the most popular philosophical framework for modern scientific practice. I'd be interested in what the above commenter has to say about Popper, though, as I am not well-read outside of his work, as my focus is on the history of science.

[-] dandelion 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

I'm not sure recommending Popper to someone who has never studied philosophy, and who is reading on their own, is a good idea ... I would probably start with a small intro to philosophy book like Blackburn's Think and then try to find lectures or resources that help teach Popper, rather than just diving into source material with no guidance.

Popper is important, but I don't think he is commonly seen to have solved the problem of induction ... he made an attempt, but that's a different story.

[-] dandelion 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

yes, though the facts and studies they link to remain true regardless - this is the strongest argument for getting a philosophy degree, it makes sense they present it

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
1023 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16374 readers
2537 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS