44
Gavin Newsom misgenders gay MAGA activist, calling him Nancy Mace
(www.lgbtqnation.com)
Overview:
The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.
Rules:
Keep discussions civil.
Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.
No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.
Shinigami Eyes:
Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.
spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::
Related:
!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
gavin newsom continues to be homophobic right wing trash.
and I'm pretty sure it's theater to make him more likeable for a future bid for the presidency - the more Gavin Newsom can alienate the unlikeable and perceived weirdo elements of the Democrats, the more he probably thinks he has a chance of picking up conservative voters in addition to the moderate Dems who would still vote for him, I wouldn't be surprised if this were an electoral strategy ...
I'm sure you're right. I'm also certain it's an asinine, braindead strategy that'll never work.
The really funny part is that they keep trying it and it keeps not working, but clearly the problem is that they didn’t do it hard enough the last 3 elections.
Democrats always trying to pick up a center that doesn't exist
Why the things he's saying now it seems they're going directly for right-wing voters. But right-wing voters already have a party that serves their flavor of bigotry just fine, and they have strong brand loyalty. These corporate Democrats have no clue, but probably some consultant told them this would work.
the center may be more transphobic than you think, he isn't using right wing dog or wolf whistles like Elon and Trump, he's mostly taking an anti-trans stance which might be somewhat popular and might be one of those dividing issues that keep otherwise "centrists" from voting for a Democrat (though mostly what polling indicates is voters don't care about the trans issue, because the GOP is flaming a moral panic about it, that is what remains salient for Dems of what the "other side" cares about).
If it didn’t exist, they’d never get votes.
The problem is that it’s rapidly shrinking in part because of their strategies and in part because they don’t call out the other party on their shit more often.
yes, I was being hyperbolic - Clinton successfully ate the Republicans' lunch by being a better conservative than them, so it seems like a consistent strategy. Democrats are more interested in appealing narrowly to reliable voters, rather than trying to appeal to people who refuse to vote, haven't ever voted, or other disenfranchised non-voters, which is a mistake because the number of people eligible to vote, but who don't reliably vote, make up a very large portion (so much that they make up the largest block of voters, larger than Dem or GOP voters in most elections - a reason electoral abstentionism seems like an unlikely strategy, since a majority already abstain with no significant impact to the government's sense of legitimacy).
Partly this is an issue of Dems being elitist, they are not into populist politics and prioritizing the lower classes in their rhetoric, and part of this is just basic electoral strategy and the kind of established, expert-approved approach to winning elections.
Replied to the wrong comment, d'oh >_<