506
rule (lemmy.zip)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

As long as we're carrying cellphones with us at all times, none of this is particularly damning in comparison.

Signal attenuation is crap compared to directional homing in on the transmitter in your pocket.

[-] dsilverz@calckey.world 0 points 12 hours ago

@rumba@lemmy.zip

The technology works by measuring the interference provoked by obstacles, including (but not limited to) walking human bodies. As we walk within the range of two or more devices communicating with each other, our bodies momentarily alter the signal, reflecting and absorbing and diffracting the original 2.4GHz wave.

Now, say I live in a condo, sandwiched between two different neighbors (Alice and Bob), and both use this Xfinity thing: while Alice wander around her apartment while doing a VoIP call on her phone, Bob's router is also broadcasting it's SSID which is then received by Alice's phone, even though Alice's phone is connected to Alice's router. The same goes for Bob's phone, which will receive the Alice's router SSID broadcast. And I, wandering around my own apartment, I'll be between the invisible crossfire. I don't even need to be carrying a phone, nor do I need to have a router. I just need to have at least two neighbors with routers and mobile devices sandwiching me between their radio signals.

Now, there are more sophisticated "WiFi vision" (used by military and police) which needs just a single Wi-Fi hotspot which will act as their "lamp". The signal will bounce all around the place, and it'll also pass through the walls, reaching the soldier's equipment, which is composed of several small Wi-Fi receptors arranged in a grid (akin to "pixels" from a DSLR digital camera sensor).

Both can be mitigated with Faraday cages. Some kinds of chicken wire, used to make chicken coops, work beautifully and they use to be cheap (as strange as it may sound, a few-dollars thing can beat a thousand-dollars thing).

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

You are greatly exaggerating how the system works and what it can generate, and you're conflating this service's ability with that of professional espionage gear.

Alice's router is reading the signal between Alice's devices and her router. As part of the wifi protocol, the router can get precise recprical information about the signal strength of the devices connected to it. It's not radar, it's i know the thermostat is connected and has -10db singal, it's at -11db now so there's something in the way, we have movement. Say she has a wifi TV and a wifi on her cellphone, if she's in between one of those devices or one of them moves closer, they can sense a change and movement. While they could try to listen to everything in the neighborhood, all they'd get is noise and fluctuations they're not building a picture, move of a corkboard with thumbtacks and string, but they have no idea what direction any of the tacks are in just how hard it is to get to them.

Bobs router is reading his stuff and ignoring alice's stuff. otherwise bob would get false positives.

Any radio emission in your house could be used like this with the right receivers.

They're not getting any directionailty from this, the router has no idea what things are in what direction, just that there are changes in field strength. The condos below you or above you would also set it off if they were trying to just listen to everything.

You keep referring to it as a lamp. It's less like a lamp and more like a speaker. the sound can carry through walls, but it's muffled. The directionality is severely reduced even if you had fine tuned directional antennas to pinpoint it. It's a little better than sound, but far closer to sound than light. The router is more like a mic. It's in one static spot and is simply omnidirecional.

It's only abile to see a table liket he following

MAC1:098324F3C40E89 -11.1 MAC2:19834F3C440E62 -12.9 MAC3:398321F3C40E28 -110.1 MAC4:4983423C440E15 -25.3 MAC5:598323F3C40E98 -16.8

if one of the numbers change and the rest don't, that's movement. They're not building pictures out of this.

Now, let's talk faraday cages.

at 2.4GHz, your hole size would have to be about 6mm maximum. better off a three or less (like a microwave door)

at 5G that would be 3mm max You're going to want brass mesh or something.

Then if you wanted to block mains, that's powerful enough that you could be detected through changes in the the magnetic b field, good luck blocking that.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
506 points (100.0% liked)

196

4194 readers
1859 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS