552
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
552 points (100.0% liked)
politics
25260 readers
1944 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
He’s breaking the law all over the US, when you’re rich… they let you. This is no different. Let’s see some consequences somewhere.
No one is "letting him". There are dozens of active cases against him and his administration, right now. The process takes time, and the media never covers it adequately...but the system is still working.
If the system were working Cannon could not have effectively blocked Trump’s prosecution. If the system were working the leader of an insurrection against the government of the United States could not have even RUN for President, much less BEEN SWORN IN. If the system were working the personal attorney for the most vile and morally corrupt President in our nation’s history would not have been NONINATED, much less CONFIRMED to a federal appellate court.
THE SYSTEM IS NOT WORKING. Any conclusions predicated on another other assumption are simply wrong.
you're right that the system is working. it is giving us its ultimate: fascism. this is the intended outcome for profit seeking capitalists. if you mean to say our system of American justice is working... surely you jest.
This is why we're doomed. I cannot believe there are people who still think like this
He won’t realize until they come for him. People like him are how it happens
isn't it disgusting? depressing as hell how these people still feel so confident in "the system."
So...do you agree with Trump when he tries to suspend or ignore the legal process? Is that your solution? Just, "as long as it's us doing it, it's fine"?
It's kind of bizarre to advocate for the very same shit he's pulling, as a defense against the kind of shit he keeps trying to pull.
Remember this exchange.
DC is under Marshall law in all but name right now.
"The Process takes time..." At this rate the process will get around to warning him he should stop shortly after he executes his political opponents and just before he starts executing judges who opposes him.
DC isn't under martial law. Technically, the district belongs to the federal government already, they've just been under a kind of conditional self-administration since the 70's, I think? The only way to take away Trump's authority over it, would be to grant DC official status as a State.
And just curious...what system would you suggest, that is better than what's currently in place?
If you're not going to bother reading posts before replying what's the point?
It's not even "in all but name", though. Martial law is not even remotely the same thing as just calling in the national guard...especially in DC.
Calling in the National Guard to do what?
That's entirely the point. Legal channels are too show to counteract everything at once. See Bannon's "stress test".
Dude. That's literally the same argument Trump was using for why he should be allowed to just deport people without due process. This is not the "solution" you think it is.
So you're saying we should "go high"... How has that been working out thus far?
No, I'm saying that the basic principles of law and justice shouldn't be abandoned just because there are people in the world who try and game the system.
It seems like everyone these days, agrees with Trump's vision of what the law should look like. My side gets a pass...and everyone I think is "bad", gets their rights taken away. People just seem to disagree about who should be punished without due process.
It's not a "moral high ground" issue. It's basic common sense. You want a legal system that's based on facts? You want people's rights to be respected? You can't have those things, if you throw them all out the window anytime things don't work out exactly the way you want them to.
Those are the things you have to fight to protect. If every law that got broken, meant the law was pointless...then we would have no laws.
This is not what's happening here. Nobody (on the left) is giving any side a "pass". What the fuck is this strawman?
A lot of people gave Biden and Obama a pass when they were deporting, torturing and bombing innocent people. Some people seem to think that those things are only bad when the Red Team is doing it.
This is not even close to the same thing, and you're either being ignorant or disingenuous by suggesting they are.
There's a difference of scale, but they still did those things. You are still right here, right now, giving them a "pass".
Where
I'm talking about selectively assigning who gets their rights protected, and who doesn't. Who deserves due process, and who doesn't. The only way any of this can be considered "legitimate" is if it applies to everyone...not just the ones you think "deserve it".