432

Donald Trump has said Vladimir Putin was “doing what anybody would do” after Russia launched a massive missile and drone strike on Ukraine days after the US cut off vital intelligence and military aid to Kyiv.

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday Trump said he finds it “easier” to work with Russia than Ukraine and that Putin “wants to end the war”.

“I’m finding it more difficult, frankly, to deal with Ukraine. And they don’t have the cards,” Trump said. “In terms of getting a final settlement, it may be easier dealing with Russia.”

Asked whether the Russian leader was taking advantage of the pause in US intelligence sharing and military aid to Ukraine, Trump replied: “I actually think he is doing what anybody else would do.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean, as if anyone or their mother would realistically accept Zelenskyy's 10 point peace nonsense.

Putin meanwhile gave out very lenient peace terms in 2022, probably the most lenient peace terms of all time in fact, so lenient, Ukraine would have kept all of its territory with even the status of Crimea being negotiable after 10-15 years and future Russian aggression would encounter a problem, the peace treaty would have the US and the UK, as guarantors, who were obliged to assist Ukraine in case of aggression against it. While the Russian Federation attempted to add on another condition where all guarantor states including Russia itself would have to agree to intervene in Ukraine possibily giving Russia the ability to veto other countries from aiding Ukraine in the event Russia broke the agreement, they were likely willing to drop that condition. Throughout the negotiations, Russia was actually dropping many of their previous demands and compromised with Ukraine on multiple occasions (unlike Zelenskyy who didn't even invite Putin to his peace summits, kinda like the Russia-US peace summits rn).

If they didn't want to fight, why not accept this lenient peace offer?

Now what was the outcome of Zelenskyy continuing the war? Right, Putin now says that Ukraine will lose land.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago

Putin meanwhile gave out very lenient peace terms in 2022

Putin invaded in 2014 seizing Crimea. Ukraine did not attack Russia.

Putin invaded Donbas and Luhansk just months later. Ukraine signed multiple peace deals which Putin violated at that time.

Putin performed a full scale invasion of Ukraine in Feb 2022.

Nothing about Putin has offered peace terms for Ukraine that Putin honors. He'll keep violating any "peace" deals until he controls all of Ukraine or he's dead.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 months ago

And nations are now realizing that Trump doesn’t fall far from the tree. He just prefers assets to land.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

He just prefers assets to land.

Make no mistake, Trump wants land too (and even more so the strategic power it affords, such as control of trade routes). That's why he's threatening to annex Greenland, the Panama canal zone, and Canada.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
  1. The post-Maidan government conducted massacres in Eastern Ukraine against unarmed protestors like in Mariupol where the AFU alongside Azov fired into an entire crowd. Russia justified its annexation of Crimea because it made an agreement with the legitimate government of Ukraine before Maidan to continue their lease over Sevastapol. Russia stated that the formation of this illegimate government threatened military infrastructure in Crimea which they rightfully owned due to an agreement with the previous government. Russia also named the massacres that were being conducted in Eastern Ukraine to annex Crimea to safeguard the lives of people in Crimea.
  2. You mean a civil war broke out between the new illegitimate government and those in Eastern Ukraine who supported the legitimate government. Russia did provide support to them that is true I guess.
  3. Due to Ukraine's violations of Minsk II.
[-] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Source for 1? And regarding 3, Minsk II was violated by Putin himself when he choose to invade Ukraine in February 2022 saying Ukraine committed genocide in Donbas with no proof of the same.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I will PM you source for 1 since I do not really know the rules regarding posting NSFW content in the comments. Minsk II was already null and void by the time he invaded due to Ukraine violating it.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Received the PM?

[-] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

So remind me again what happened in Donetsk and luhansk prior to Russia crossing the border?

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It was at peace. That changed when Russian crossed the border as "little green men" unmarked Russian troops started the hot war there. Putin even admitted this was Russia:

"After two months of denial, on 17 April 2014, Russian president Vladimir Putin confirmed that the Russian military had been operating in Ukraine.[9][10] Furthermore, numerous sources, including Russian state-owned media, have confirmed that the little green men were a mix of operatives from the Special Operations Forces and various other units of the Spetsnaz GRU. It likely also included paratroopers of the 45th Guards Spetsnaz Brigade of the Russian Airborne Forces,[11][12][13] as well as mercenaries from the Russian state-funded Wagner Group.[14][15] While their status as soldiers acting under the orders of the Russian government was continually denied, their nationality was not. Alexander Borodai of the unrecognized Donetsk People's Republic stated that 50,000 Russian citizens had fought in Ukraine's Donbas by August 2015 and argued that they should receive the same benefits as Russia's other war veterans, though he maintained that the Russian government did not send them.[16]" source

[-] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

Casual genocide denial from I see. Not a single mentioned of the 15000 people killed by the fascist before that. Disgusting.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Casual genocide denial from I see.

That's absolutely delicious considering you're defending Russia and their actions in Ukraine. You have zero credibility. You want to see genocide, look in your own history and you'll see what Russia did to Ukraine in the past with 3.5 million dead Ukrainians with the Holodomor.

[-] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ok fascist, don't answer then

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

The russian apologist strikes again...

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago

Well at least someone is apologizing; Russia doesn’t appear to have any intention to do so.

[-] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

Begone, propagandist. Peace is elusive because the Russian government has engineered the situation to be so. That you think they were "likely" to drop an obvious showstopper clause means absolutely nothing; the actual parties to the negotiation clearly did not feel that to be true.

For others who want more insight on how the 2022 talks unfolded: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/15/world/europe/ukraine-russia-ceasefire-deal.html

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 28 points 4 months ago

Remind me - how many times has Putin actually kept to the terms of a ceasefire? Cause that's exactly what he's known for.

In the end, we all know:

-Putin is an asshole

-Ukraine did not pose the slightest military threat, and were not the aggressors

So, when it comes down to it, fuck Putin and his so called "lenient" terms. Bruising Putin's ego is not, in fact, a crime.

Everyone knows Putin will not settle for peace. He just wants to fix supply side issues to continue the offensive. You know this. It's not that you don't see the evil in that man; you defend it because you support it anyway.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 months ago

Russian troll, nothing to see here.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes because everyone you disagree with, is a Russian troll.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago

Oh honey, you int fooling anyone.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago
[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] 2xar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Then why are you writing like one?

[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

2 day old account spewing this dribble

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Are you actually functionally retarded or was there a lobotomy involved?

[-] ech@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

They're being an apologist piece of shit, but it doesn't justify ableism like that.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

No one cares Karen, you don't get to feign indignation while you spew bullshit and apologize for murderous invaders.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Bullshit is when you back your words with actual facts and then people can't argue back but instead insult you.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

No one is arguing the fact it's the disphit opinion mixed in as fact that's the issue.

[-] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Again, Rude.

I suggest taking a deep breath.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I suggest shutting the fuck up if your going to be thin skinned and a Nazi.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Rude.

Also not a Nazi. In fact, I even argue with Nazis, many times in fact.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

It was intended to be.

Ya huh, and China is a people's Republic.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
432 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24959 readers
2497 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS