432

Donald Trump has said Vladimir Putin was “doing what anybody would do” after Russia launched a massive missile and drone strike on Ukraine days after the US cut off vital intelligence and military aid to Kyiv.

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday Trump said he finds it “easier” to work with Russia than Ukraine and that Putin “wants to end the war”.

“I’m finding it more difficult, frankly, to deal with Ukraine. And they don’t have the cards,” Trump said. “In terms of getting a final settlement, it may be easier dealing with Russia.”

Asked whether the Russian leader was taking advantage of the pause in US intelligence sharing and military aid to Ukraine, Trump replied: “I actually think he is doing what anybody else would do.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 151 points 1 week ago

I mean, if Putin just wants to stop fighting, he could completely just you know: stop fucking fighting.

He’s the invader. He’s the fucking aggressor. Ukraine would happily stop fighting as they don’t want to fight.

Donald Trump is top tier fucking stupid and top tier Russian asset.

[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

Russia almost cannot “stop” if it means getting nothing. If they do Putin will lose support and money from his oligarchs/bitches.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

If they do Putin will lose support and money from his oligarchs/bitches.

That's Putin's problem. Let him join the defenstration-fest, the bloodthirsty greedhead, and Trump with him.

[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I actually thought we should’ve had Putin assassinated years ago, but nobody cares what I think. I’m just an asshole who got kicked off of Reddit 

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

you forget that people like that have literal legions that their sole job is to protect a persons life. not just bodyguards, but intelligence agents who's sole job it is , is to prepare for any kind of credible threat.

and remember russia is a country that has an entire militarized police force that its only real job, is to keep the boot on the neck of not the people, but the russian military, so that they dont get any funny ideas about revolting.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Would he, though?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, if Putin just wants to stop fighting, he could completely just you know: stop fucking fighting.

I cannot imagine a world in which Russia withdraws from the front lines and Ukrainian militants just call it a day. Way too much blood on the ground for people to just turn themselves off and call it done.

If Putin extended an offer that didn't involve him eating the barrel of his own gun, Zelenskyy's own guys would lynch him for taking it.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Well, obviously Ukraine would chase the invaders back to the pre-2014 borders and then stop.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's how wars always work. You stop at the other guy's border because you've made your point.

[-] marcianojones@lemmy.org 8 points 1 week ago

Didn't they just stop fighting in ww1 ? I don't think its the same but not impossible. True Putin should retreat and leave the Ukrainian soil.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Stopping fighting is how most wars ended. It's not a fucking cage match between two militaries that only ends after every person in one of the two militaries is dead.

[-] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Everyone who believes this shit is a victim of severe brainwashing. Nobody, not even an actual mental retard, would believe what Trump and putin are saying. It's because Trump followers are victims of brainwashing. They are mentally ill.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, as if anyone or their mother would realistically accept Zelenskyy's 10 point peace nonsense.

Putin meanwhile gave out very lenient peace terms in 2022, probably the most lenient peace terms of all time in fact, so lenient, Ukraine would have kept all of its territory with even the status of Crimea being negotiable after 10-15 years and future Russian aggression would encounter a problem, the peace treaty would have the US and the UK, as guarantors, who were obliged to assist Ukraine in case of aggression against it. While the Russian Federation attempted to add on another condition where all guarantor states including Russia itself would have to agree to intervene in Ukraine possibily giving Russia the ability to veto other countries from aiding Ukraine in the event Russia broke the agreement, they were likely willing to drop that condition. Throughout the negotiations, Russia was actually dropping many of their previous demands and compromised with Ukraine on multiple occasions (unlike Zelenskyy who didn't even invite Putin to his peace summits, kinda like the Russia-US peace summits rn).

If they didn't want to fight, why not accept this lenient peace offer?

Now what was the outcome of Zelenskyy continuing the war? Right, Putin now says that Ukraine will lose land.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

Putin meanwhile gave out very lenient peace terms in 2022

Putin invaded in 2014 seizing Crimea. Ukraine did not attack Russia.

Putin invaded Donbas and Luhansk just months later. Ukraine signed multiple peace deals which Putin violated at that time.

Putin performed a full scale invasion of Ukraine in Feb 2022.

Nothing about Putin has offered peace terms for Ukraine that Putin honors. He'll keep violating any "peace" deals until he controls all of Ukraine or he's dead.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

And nations are now realizing that Trump doesn’t fall far from the tree. He just prefers assets to land.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

He just prefers assets to land.

Make no mistake, Trump wants land too (and even more so the strategic power it affords, such as control of trade routes). That's why he's threatening to annex Greenland, the Panama canal zone, and Canada.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
  1. The post-Maidan government conducted massacres in Eastern Ukraine against unarmed protestors like in Mariupol where the AFU alongside Azov fired into an entire crowd. Russia justified its annexation of Crimea because it made an agreement with the legitimate government of Ukraine before Maidan to continue their lease over Sevastapol. Russia stated that the formation of this illegimate government threatened military infrastructure in Crimea which they rightfully owned due to an agreement with the previous government. Russia also named the massacres that were being conducted in Eastern Ukraine to annex Crimea to safeguard the lives of people in Crimea.
  2. You mean a civil war broke out between the new illegitimate government and those in Eastern Ukraine who supported the legitimate government. Russia did provide support to them that is true I guess.
  3. Due to Ukraine's violations of Minsk II.
[-] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Source for 1? And regarding 3, Minsk II was violated by Putin himself when he choose to invade Ukraine in February 2022 saying Ukraine committed genocide in Donbas with no proof of the same.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I will PM you source for 1 since I do not really know the rules regarding posting NSFW content in the comments. Minsk II was already null and void by the time he invaded due to Ukraine violating it.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Received the PM?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

The russian apologist strikes again...

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Well at least someone is apologizing; Russia doesn’t appear to have any intention to do so.

[-] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

Begone, propagandist. Peace is elusive because the Russian government has engineered the situation to be so. That you think they were "likely" to drop an obvious showstopper clause means absolutely nothing; the actual parties to the negotiation clearly did not feel that to be true.

For others who want more insight on how the 2022 talks unfolded: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/15/world/europe/ukraine-russia-ceasefire-deal.html

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago

Remind me - how many times has Putin actually kept to the terms of a ceasefire? Cause that's exactly what he's known for.

In the end, we all know:

-Putin is an asshole

-Ukraine did not pose the slightest military threat, and were not the aggressors

So, when it comes down to it, fuck Putin and his so called "lenient" terms. Bruising Putin's ego is not, in fact, a crime.

Everyone knows Putin will not settle for peace. He just wants to fix supply side issues to continue the offensive. You know this. It's not that you don't see the evil in that man; you defend it because you support it anyway.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

Russian troll, nothing to see here.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes because everyone you disagree with, is a Russian troll.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Oh honey, you int fooling anyone.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Too literate. This bozo at least writes at a high-school level.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] 2xar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Then why are you writing like one?

[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

2 day old account spewing this dribble

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Are you actually functionally retarded or was there a lobotomy involved?

[-] ech@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

They're being an apologist piece of shit, but it doesn't justify ableism like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
432 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21885 readers
2831 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS