749
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Droechai@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

If we could make Jupiter a black hole, would that be stable enough to not radiate away? Other big body we have access to is the sun and I feel we would suffer more side effects of turning that into a hole compared to Jupiter

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Should we be making any of these things a black hole?

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

Replacing Jupiter with an equally massive black hole shouldn’t make a difference. We’d only have one bright dot less in the night sky.

[-] pixeltree 1 points 1 year ago

Except squid aliens will develop a way to move it and annihilate several planets on its way to Super Earth. RIP Angel's Venture.

(This is currently happening in helldivers 2, we turned a super bug infested planet into a black hole and now the illuminate are steering it towards earth)

[-] Droechai@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The sun is debatable, since I think we already use it's photons both for photosynthesis in plants, heat (although we could get infrared warmth from the hole) as well as other benefits

Why shouldn't we holify Jupiter? It would be a testament to our technological progress as well as helping us study black holes "close"ish by rather than in labs

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sometimes our technological progress makes us do things we think are a good idea at the time. Then like years, decades, centuries, millennia later we realize it was not such a good idea after all.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

If Jupiter was compressed to a black hole it would be 2.8 metres across and would last longer than the Sun

[-] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Scientists care too much about if we could, they forget to ask if we should.

[-] spooky2092 1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure if we made Jupiter a black hole we'd throw off our orbit and have much bigger problems.

[-] mbfalzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't a Jupiter-mass black hole have the same gravitational effects as Jupiter and absolutely nothing would be affected?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you were very, very close to it, not exactly, since Jupiter's mass is more spread out, making the gravitational pull slightly weaker at close range. But for practical purposes yeah nothing would change for us other than space debris being flung around it instead of hitting it.

[-] spooky2092 1 points 1 year ago

My point was more that we'd probably have to increase the mass to be able to make it a black hole, as we don't have the ability to compress it to a singularity.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 4 points 1 year ago

Black holes aren't vacuums, nothing would change if the mass was equivalent

[-] spooky2092 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but you'd more than likely have to increase the mass of Jupiter to make it a black hole.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 3 points 1 year ago

That wasn't part of the hypothetical though

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
749 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

19292 readers
1374 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS