940
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tree_frog@lemm.ee 217 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not sure if the article covers it, still reading, but one of the things they want to do to disenfranchise transfoks is to require the the name on your birth certificate matches you're legal name in order to vote.

As most married women don't change their name on their birth certificate when they take their husbands last name, they would not be able to vote either.

Edit: The article does go into all of this.

[-] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Trans rights are human rights.

[-] leds@feddit.dk 3 points 15 hours ago

Also to make it harder for people with non western names to vote

[-] Banana@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 day ago

Interesting thing about that is that, while it's still common practice, a lot of more left-leaning women did away with taking their husband's name years ago

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

I took my spouse’s name because I hated my old one.

But I will happily be a class representative for the lawsuit against this bill.

[-] Banana@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Power to you!! Totally get wanting to change your name, people have plenty reason to do so!

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 54 points 1 day ago

Yeah my wife and I just kept our name. Its funny because over the years we sorta wish we would have done the traditional thing as it would make a variety of things easier but now apparently its becoming a brilliant move.

[-] raoulduke85@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

My wife did the same, but for unofficial stuff, she uses my last name as hers.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 1 day ago

yeah its more problematic for official stuff really. like being in the hospital. Its not much but like you tend to have to make it more clear your the spouse.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We got married ten years ago and she didn't take my name. I'm very much cool with it, and it's got easier over the years.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 1 day ago

yeah it was a slow burn annoyance and she gets annoyed by it more than I but it took like 20 odd years to be like. This is sorta annoying. EDITED - hey so im rethinking and it started at about the 10 year mark and built up over time but as I said its little things. My wife has a lot of medical issues though so we might have more nuisance around it than the typical couple.

We all got our struggles. Ours are shitty and I'm sure you guys have shitty ones too. Fucking life is shitty. All we can do is try to help our people out when we can.

[-] tree_frog@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Left leaning women are also far less likely to get married to begin with.

The article actually points all of that out, it will be Republican women who mostly are disenfranchised by this.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

In a sort of twisted way that could result in a blue wave if they disenfranchised ~half of their own voters and not the left.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 22 points 1 day ago

They’ll presumably remedy this by giving husbands extra votes on behalf of their wives and children, as in Franco-era Spain.

[-] raoulduke85@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

My wife didn’t take my last name and I’m so glad.

[-] Banana@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

My mom never took my dad's so I grew up with that being the norm, so I took it step further and my partner and I are not even married despite being together 11 years.

Yeah my partner and I didn't get married until 8 years deep, and that's going steady. We were fucking on and off for years before. We did it to appease our family. Never had any kids thank the hole in the ozone.

[-] Banana@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Tbqh i don't know if we are ever gonna get married, just because it's not the main priority, but I do make sure he's my beneficiary for most things.

[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago

Holy. Fucking. Shit. That’s bad. That’s oppressively stupid fucking bad.

Hey Americans: Don’t want to be oppressed or live in a fascist state? Immigrate to Canada! We’re hella friendly and open to people’s of all kinds, except MAGAs and Nazis and or maga-nazis

[-] ArtemisimetrA@lemmy.duck.cafe 16 points 1 day ago
[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Hmm. You all raise a good point. As Canadians, I think we need to make it easier for Americans to immigrate here.

We need to experience and expertise and we need to learn how to expedite that to bring the right people here to help expand Canadas capabilities.

Canadians, how to we make this happen? I have zero knowledge how to make this happen.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

You guys seem to have a very open asylum policy. Give it a few years and a lot of Americans might qualify without you doing anything else.

For real I'm not even allowed in that country for a crime I committed 20 years ago.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

I would move up there next week if it was that easy and didn't mean probably losing my awesome job. Oh, and it might be a bit disruptive for my family, too.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

I'm moving to Sweden but I'll be stopping by your way first! I'm too trans to let tsa look at my passport so I'm going to land travel to you all and take a plane out from there

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago
[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Unless things have changed significantly at the border in the past few years, there's no process to leave the US. It's just the Canadian border guard checking things as you enter their country.

Of course, if the GOP decides to fully enact Operation: Handmaid's Tale, then that could change.

[-] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

I was going to say, “no, stay and fight”, but on second thought I agree with this sentiment for more vulnerable groups like trans folks

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Give us places to stay, welcome us, and offer us work and we'll gladly come

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I’m still happy with Massachusetts, but my company is based in UK and we have an office outside Toronto. The road is paved

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 1 day ago

Toronto is the one city that everything else being even I think I might like to live more than where I am at.

[-] djsoren19 3 points 1 day ago

Ha, if only that was an actual possibility. Most Americans will not qualify for immigration to Western countries.

I'd also hold off on thinking you'll be safe. Poilievre might be unpopular now, but there's a lot of time between now and the election. It's not a slam dunk for Liberal, fascism can absolutely still rise in your country too.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Long term, this seems like an effective way to end that custom. What person would go into marriage changing their name when they know this attitude is at play?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

It's cute you think that's not another right they'll quickly take away from women as soon as they can.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Republicans destroy marriage with this one neat trick!

If they force women to change their names with marriage, women will simply stop getting married.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Oh you sweet summer child...

"We need Christian men leading the fight against abortion," arguing that women's suffrage was a mistake, and accusing Hawkins of emasculating her husband by being "busy jet-setting."

This is only the first step. It will not stop until women are property.
If you don't get married than your father will own you until he decides who you will marry.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

In British Columbia, there is no legal requirement to change your last name after marriage, and either spouse can legally use either last name at their leisure without any bureaucratic change. It is a genderless law.

Fuckin A, now I am really appreciating that.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 1 day ago

so anyone who changes their name? So like a whole bunch of hollywood. two birds one stone I guess from their view.

[-] tree_frog@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

If it's a legal name change. But I assume a lot of Hollywood names aren't legally changed, but more similar to a pen name.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 1 day ago

I hate pasting this url but it talks about actors who did and the first one was because of a requirment for the actor to have the same stage and legal name so don't understand that but it was david tennant so maybe something with international that complicated it. https://www.buzzfeed.com/kristenharris1/celebrities-changed-legal-names-stage-names

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It depends on how much paperwork you do when you change your names, how much autocracy you want to fight

When my ex divorced me she warned me me she wasn’t going through that again so I just need to deal with her keeping my name. She kept half of everything else of mine so I guess it’s no difference

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 1 day ago

Well that was the thing. If we did it off the bat it was like a checkbox, but to do it later is a larger nuissance than the nuissance of them being different.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

My wife and I were talking about this last night. She chose not to change her name when we got married, as she's been down that road before and has no desire to do it again. I'm totally fine with it, she's been able to grow and discover things about herself now that she "wasn't allowed to" in her past marriage, and I love helping her realize that. We also just got our passports the other day - work wants me to get mine and paid for it, so she got hers as well.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Yep, that's in there:

House Republicans passed a bill (which stalled in the Senate) this session to require citizens to have a passport or birth certificate matching their name to vote.

[-] ChadMcTruth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

i had some ideas about this that i shared recently https://lemmy.world/post/25499276

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
940 points (100.0% liked)

News

25384 readers
4160 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS