546
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Hey gang, I'm very closely related to this field and wanted to share some insight into this!

This is VERY COMMON practice for these situations. The idea is not to cover up inhumane tactics, but protect our personnel. While I'm sure a majority of these individuals are simple illegal immigrants who have no ill intentions, there are criminal gangs being caught up in this. Not the entire gang is being picked up, just the illegal immigrants. So the policy of removing identification from the uniforms is to protect the military member and their family.

These commands come from the highest level, meaning each individual service member is not making the decision for themselves, but they are being commanded as a whole. Much as some might not like the connotations associated with this, it is a common practice and relevant due to the stated purpose of these missions.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 43 points 1 week ago

This is VERY COMMON practice for these situations.

No, no it's not. Maybe when operating in dangerous missions while deployed overseas.... While working on American soil? No.

None of the other branches being ordered to do similarly sketchy quasi unconstitutional work have removed their identifiers, none of the other branches have opted to classify the work they are doing.

The Air Force has a pretty well known history of racism, rape, and Christian nationalist in their command structure. Out of all the branches it doesn't surprise me at all that the Air Force is the branch falling over itself to follow trump's orders.

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Out of all the branches it doesn't surprise me at all that the Air Force is the branch falling over itself to follow trump's orders.

I'm not sure how you can imply that you're familiar with how the military operates and then say something as ignorant as this.

All branches of the military "fall over themselves" to follow the orders of the President. That's literally how the chain of command works.

Be upset at Trump for assigning shit missions, but it's incredibly ignorant to attack any specific branch of the military for following lawful orders.

What do you picture the alternative to be? That some Airman should get himself court marshalled for refusing the order to remove his name and unit patch?

Could you explain how transporting people to their country of origin is an illegal order?

Or, maybe explain how you would handle the order as an enlisted soldier?

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Be upset at Trump for assigning shit missions, but it's incredibly ignorant to attack any specific branch of the military for following lawful orders.

They are going above and beyond the assignment of the mission. As I said, the other branches have received similar orders but have made what they are doing public, and have not decided to operate anonymously.

That some Airman should get himself court marshalled for refusing the order to remove his name and unit patch?

Did I criticize the airman? No, I specifically criticized their command.

Could you explain how transporting people to their country of origin is an illegal order?

The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385, original at 20 Stat. 152) signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes that limits the powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States.

[-] Sightline@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, no it’s not.

Yes it is, those are Fly Away Security Teams (FAST) or Ravens. Go look it up, 95% of the official Air Force photos of FAST/Raven show people without nametapes, example taken from here.

Furthermore:

  1. I can just take my top off if it's not too hot. My t-shirt does not have a nametape

  2. I can just buy a nametape that says "Smith" or something common and you wouldn't know the difference.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

And how often are they operating on American soil.......?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

This is VERY COMMON practice for these situations.

Maybe it shouldn't be. You know, what with accountability being a thing that people should be held to...

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Thank you for sharing your perspective and informing us that cowardly evasion of accountability in the execution of inhumane operations is a common practice in the service. Some folks out there might not have suspected this already.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 1 week ago

They always have another option: walk away.

[-] Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That is literally not an option for a very large majority of these service members. That'll be an Article 15 for sure, maybe a courtmartial.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 1 week ago

Yes, the people made to assist the Nazis in the 1930s/40s had to make some tough decisions too.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Taking an Article 15 or court-martial instead of participating in massive civil rights violations not only absolutely is an option, but it's the only ethical one!

[-] prole 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They executed Nazis who were "just following orders."

Rightfully so.

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

No, they executed Nazis for operating death camps.

They did not execute for "just following orders", aka Nuremberg Defense.

As it turns out, soldiers in all militaries follow orders every day without being executed.

Unless you're going to explain how removing a unit patch and name tag, or transporting people to their country of origin is worthy of execution, I'm not sure that you have an argument.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 1 week ago

Resigning ones commission is exactly the type of meaningful protest that is needed. Nazis soldiers got pay and retirement benefits as well but tough things are tough to do. It sorta cracks me up because you say literally not an option and then present the very literal options they have.

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

They're just rounding up the dangerous Jews, I mean illegal immigrants. Everybody relax.

[-] ninjabard@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

We're just trying to hide our identity while committing crimes acting on orders from the Criminal in Chief because all of our white robes and hoods turned pink due to a MAGA cap that somehow ended up in the wash.

Got it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole 11 points 1 week ago
[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago

Being in America without paperwork isn't a criminal charge, it is civil, so they aren't even here illegally, by the definition of the law. They are undocumented immigrants, not illegal.

The Nazis are trying to change the narrative to make it sound like there's an evil scary cabal of people trying to destroy out country, to move the arrow away from pointing at the Nazis in power.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

What’s your favorite film? Starship Troopers? Go back to reddit.stormfront.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
546 points (100.0% liked)

News

25189 readers
3693 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS