546
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 1 week ago

They always have another option: walk away.

[-] Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That is literally not an option for a very large majority of these service members. That'll be an Article 15 for sure, maybe a courtmartial.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 1 week ago

Yes, the people made to assist the Nazis in the 1930s/40s had to make some tough decisions too.

[-] prole 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They executed Nazis who were "just following orders."

Rightfully so.

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

No, they executed Nazis for operating death camps.

They did not execute for "just following orders", aka Nuremberg Defense.

As it turns out, soldiers in all militaries follow orders every day without being executed.

Unless you're going to explain how removing a unit patch and name tag, or transporting people to their country of origin is worthy of execution, I'm not sure that you have an argument.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Taking an Article 15 or court-martial instead of participating in massive civil rights violations not only absolutely is an option, but it's the only ethical one!

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 1 week ago

Resigning ones commission is exactly the type of meaningful protest that is needed. Nazis soldiers got pay and retirement benefits as well but tough things are tough to do. It sorta cracks me up because you say literally not an option and then present the very literal options they have.

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
546 points (100.0% liked)

News

25189 readers
3665 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS