1079
deepseek (lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And yet there’s still a carbon cost attached to eating said fish because you have to catch it. Plants always have a lower cost

Regardless most aren’t catching their own fish and are eating farmed fish.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That statement is not supported by fact or logic, it's irrational. You are in a dogma. This is useless.

It's like arguing with a religious person "God exist" is their argument, and that's it. This is the same. So, sorry, I'm out.

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Says the guy who can’t understand the carbon cost of an animal is higher than a plant whose energy comes from the sunlight.

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
1079 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6320 readers
2200 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS