633
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 28 points 5 days ago

I hope she’s saving for retirement. How does she expect to make money when she gets older and the OnlyFans crowd no longer wants to masturbate to her videos?

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 65 points 5 days ago

Nobody sees a sports athlete get a million dollar contract and says "I hope this guy is saving for retirement. How does he expect to make money when he can't pitch fastballs at 100 mph?" Why does this comment only happen to women being models?

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 56 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It’s actually discussed a lot in sports. There are many stories of athletes who earned millions and were broke just a couple of years after retirement because they didn’t have the right people around to help them prepare.

I’m a basketball fan, so here’s an example: https://fadeawayworld.net/20-nba-players-who-went-broke-and-lost-millions-of-dollars

In a 2009 report published by Sports Illustrated, it was estimated that 60% of NBA players will go broke within 5 years of retiring.

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 days ago

I have a theory about that that I’ll now subject lemmy to! Professional sportsers are often heavily managed from a very young age (practice schedules, diet monitoring, weightlifting regime, traveling). Even in college they often have to sign up for special versions of classes to fit with their schedules (on top of the diet/exercise/practice/travel) making fewer of their own day to day decisions than their peers. When they leave the sport they don’t have all these other people dictating their lives anymore but they haven’t had enough experience living on their own or room to make certain mistakes they would have learned from if they’d been in charge of more of their time and decisions.

[-] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

I’ve actually found that college athletes (the ones I get to teach) are much better prepared (for “adulting”) than their peers at graduation. They have much better time management skills and tend to manage and navigate group dynamics better. I think some of what you are saying heavily depends on the sport or perhaps athletic level. I’m not teaching anyone near going pro, they just like their sport and enjoyed the scholarship.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Yeah, that's cause there is a big difference between someone who is going to college and also playing sports vs someone at college to play sports.

If your a student athlete that is never going pro, then you need good time management, keep up grades, etc. If your someone going pro things are a lot different.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago

From what I’ve heard, you’re right. While athletes are pulling in money for the people upstairs, people take care of them. Once they retire, they become worthless to management/ownership, so they’re thrown to the wolves. With no money management skills of their own, a lot of them go broke.

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah recently heard a sports announcer saying that it was amazing that a 31-year-old was playing at the level that they were.

I was like, bro, he's 31. What the fuck.

[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

I'm going to make a generalization and say that someone in a PhD program (any PhD program) is more practical and better at handling financial planning than 95% of all professional athletes.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 5 days ago

I guess I’m weird, then, because I think that - especially regarding Olympic athletes in sports that don’t have much of a following.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

i just repeated what others below said better

~~a ton of famous athletes go broke after retiring because they are retired at like 35 or 40 with an unsustainable lifestyle. So many bad car dealerships and bad restruarants are retired pro athletes trying to maintain a lifestyle that they should have avoided while destroying their body for cash.~~

[-] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 47 points 5 days ago

Lol having a PhD doesn't get you a pension. She'll make more from OF than she'd ever make by staying in academia.

[-] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

So much this. PhD just means you are earning significantly less than your peers for at least six years, and then if you stay in academia, it’s less your whole life. There are some nice perks though, but for purely monetary reasons, you do not go for a PhD.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah basically the only PhD that pays is AI research if it can get you a job at OpenAI.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

But better hurry before we move on to the next fad!

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Or OpenAI assassinates you for revealing that all the data it's being trained on is copyrighted and that it's a bubble built on a house of cards.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 40 points 5 days ago

If she's not a complete idiot, she probably already has more retirement savings than the average gen-xer. Assuming the pyramid scheme that is our stock market keeps growing, she might have already saved all she needs to. If the bubble collapses, she will just be living in a mad max apocalypse with the rest of us.

[-] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 33 points 5 days ago

She can always go back to STEM later. OnlyFans is not necessarily the end of a career.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago

I hope that’s what she does. She was intelligent and hardworking enough to get into the program in the first place, so that’s good.

[-] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago

She didn't stop being intelligent when she started doing only fans.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago

Of course she didn’t.

[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

You say that like she was going to make a fortune in academia.

She's dropped out of a doctorate which means she likely already has more qualifications than you and I combined.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 5 days ago

OnlyFans has a reputation for people exploiting their looks. OnlyFans users have a reputation for judging people based on their looks. As you may have noticed, people tend to be judged as less attractive as they get older.

I’m not endorsing that system, I’m just evaluating it based on how people act.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago

So does the NFL. Are you making sure NFL players are saving for retirement, too?

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 5 points 5 days ago

If one posted here, I sure would! It’s a shame when people who have usually been exploited most of their lives are allowed to go bankrupt.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

You think a woman choosing to enter sex work is being exploited? OF and the NFL can be exploitative platforms, but because they are corporations, not because someone on the internet forgot to save the people taking part in those enterprises

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago

Actually, I was talking about athletes who are fed lies, sometimes since high school. Sorry I didn’t specify.

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
633 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11542 readers
1011 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS