1152
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Which means they've made the calculation that they don't need or want the anti-genocide vote.

So don't blame this anti-genocide voter for not voting for a candidate that doesn't want me.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 3 weeks ago

And in doing so, you are hanging out to dry LGBTQ+, women, racial minorities, anyone working for minimum wage, anyone with health insurance, thousands of federal employees, the people of Ukraine, and when it really comes down to it, the people of Gaza.

There is no anti-genocide option on the table. Not in any meaningful way. It's not a real choice at all, to be honest, but the direction is clear.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

There is no anti-genocide option on the table.

If you find yourself writing this, then stop what you're doing and re-evaluate your entire ideology.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 13 points 3 weeks ago

There is no anti-genocide option on the table. That's not ideology, it's reality.

[-] svcg 2 points 3 weeks ago

If you hate imperialism hard enough, a viable third party candidate will emerge. You just have to try harder. /s

[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

There is an anti-genocide option on the table, but neither democrats nor republicans are willing to use it. You should stop defending people who support genocide by pretending genocide is the only option.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's not anything I can vote for, and not voting doesn't get us there, either. There is no real choice.

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine if all those people stood together against genocide instead of dividing over it. Women alone are like half the population... Why are they siding with genocide? They could elect anyone they want. Anyone with health insurance? That's almost everyone. Bam, anyone they want. If a gay person votes for genocide how much should I really give a shit about them? There's no "meaningful choice" because the libs get out early saying so... But if it's not this election then certainly by the next one, millennials and zoomers are gonna be done with the old boomer parties.. And good riddance

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 3 weeks ago

I can imagine. Let's say all these groups unanimously decided not to vote for democrats. Then they ask who they do vote for.

Feminists vote for the best feminist candidate they can find. BLM votes for the best civil rights candidate they can find. LGBTQ people vote for the queerist person they can find. None of them support genocide, but none of them are voting for the same person.

Now Trump wins with the vote split 40/20/20/20. Great job, we overwhelmingly voted against genocide and it only got worse.

There is no anti-genocide option on the table. It is not a real choice.

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ugh... We need ranked choice so bad

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

They've probably also figured out how many people saying that will actually fold with a little arm twisting. Would be super interesting to see those numbers.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
1152 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5491 readers
2101 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS