88

BRING IT ON NITPICKY NUKE NERDS

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Alright so you can have them funding the next generation of nuclear power, which would eventually bring this new form into the mainstream by having them deal with the costs associated with ironing out any issues they have and very likely making it economically viable…

Or…

These tech companies can use fossil fuels to power their AI. Like it or not, they arent going to stop developing AI and data centers. They need the power either way. Solar and wind won’t keep up with that level of demand and tech companies know it. So choose. Nuclear, or fossil fuels?

[-] FredFig@awful.systems 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're correct that I can't stop them from making pants on head stupid decisions, but I'm not going to stop making fun of them.

very likely making it economically viable…

They're going to fund currently economically nonviable nuclear plants to power their currently economically nonviable genAI schemes? Over the time horizon of ~~25 years~~ a decade (edit: misread the article) before they scale up energy capacity at all past the rnd stage? Maybe pants on head is too generous.

[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I’m not crunching the numbers over here, but they must be making money off AI if they’re doing this. I’m sure they have further plans that aren’t public yet.

I’m not a fan of AI, so if Microsoft or Google ends up in a dumpster fire because of all this I will never stop laughing about it. I just don’t expect it.

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 18 points 1 month ago

I’m not crunching the numbers over here, but they must be making money off AI if they’re doing this.

Sounds familiar...

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 17 points 1 month ago

but they must be making money off X if they’re doing this.

is such a laughable, ridiculous thing to say, like what the fuck dude, where did you get this idea from even

[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah corporations love spending massive amounts of money on projects with no return on their investment. Microsoft is signing a 20 year contract for massive amounts of power for funsies, and totally handing out copilot licenses for free to all the other corporations that are adopting it.

Have you ever sat in a meeting with corporate people? All they every think about is money money and more money. Laugh all you want - MS is doing the laughing as every company scrambles to adopt AI purely out of fear of being left behind, and they are paying for it. The install base is already so huge for the OS, this is the easiest payout they could ask for. They have to shit the bed HARD to fuck this up.

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah corporations love spending massive amounts of money on projects with no return on their investment.

This message squirted into the ether from my Zune

They have to shit the bed HARD to fuck this up.

Fun fact: The default color for the Zune was brown.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago

I’ll take “comments posted with extremely definite and concrete knowledge of current operator spend and market dynamics” for 2c, Alex

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 11 points 1 month ago

The tech industry runs on investors spurred on by hype and promises of huge profits somewhere in the future

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago
[-] bitofhope@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago

Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years.

Some Wikipedia editor has a nice sense of comedic timing, placing this right before the article picture and the infobox before dropping the

At the end of 2001, it was revealed that Enron's reported financial condition was sustained by an institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting fraud, known since as the Enron scandal.

[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Man the internet is wild. I say MS probably has a plan to profit from AI based on their 20 year contract for nuclear power and you guys are like “but Enron failed!” Holy fuck ya really reaching to pick those cherries now

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago

Your blithe trust in capital fails to be endearing.

[-] self@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago

it’s weird that Enron of all things was the line for them

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago

I'm also impressed that the bailey they retreat into ('I just said that they would have a plan to make money over 20 years') is just as badly defendable as the motte 'they must be making money'. Quality work.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

There's a full cherry tree, you can pick as many cherries as you can eat.

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago

has a plan to profit

You say "plan" but I think what you really mean is that Satya crossed his fingers and hoped for the best

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

MS is doing the laughing as every company scrambles to adopt AI purely out of fear of being left behind

Hey man, as someone who literally worked at MSFT in Azure Identity a year ago, let me assure you, this is exactly what MSFT is also doing while their devs scratch their heads in bewilderment on how on earth they're going to incorporate genAI into the auth token service.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago

they're not. chatgpt4 burns more energy than subscription is worth, and that was text only and before that 4o shitshow

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Look, Sam Altman is a billionaire and a genius. He has a plan! So what if OpenAI is losing money on every request that ChatGPT serves? They'll make it up in volume! Any idiot can see the genius in that.

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 14 points 1 month ago

I’m sure they have further plans that aren’t public yet.

Nah dawg you’re just too stupid to see how bubbles work.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

but they must be making money off AI if they’re doing this.

They don't have to be, just the fear of another platform developing the same AI SaaS shit which could drive customers away/make it harder to convince C-level management to up their spending could cause fomo at the people building the AI. similar as with the same with the cryptocurrency/blockchain shit. Think we linked an article talking about things like this here a short while ago.

E: Here

[-] FredFig@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago

Meta's happy to give away models for free, so models are evidently worth $0.

load more comments (30 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1425 readers
168 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS