700
submitted 10 months ago by Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 386 points 10 months ago

How is "someone called" enough evidence to enter peoples homes and arrest them?
These officers should lose their job,

[-] abbiistabbii 381 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So (not so) fun fact: Keffals, who was targeted by KiwiFarms for being trans (yes that's all) and got Swatted. She then went to stay with another streamer (EllenFromNowOn) in Northern Ireland. Just for information sake, Northern Ireland is still a bit rocky security wise, Police there still carry guns on the regular. So when she went there, Ellen called up the police and explained the situation to them (they had never heard of Swatting weirdly enough).

Sure enough, someone found her flat, posted her address (with a message referencing a Unionist Slogan, Ellen was from the Catholic Community), and sure enough, the police came. Instead of raiding her all guns blasing (which they normally would) they saw the warning, knocked on the door, saw nothing was wrong, called off the squaddies, and came in to basically make sure everything was okay.

Bare in mind, this was in Northern Ireland, a place where the Police still drive Armored cars and have regular riots, and they handled this better than the Police in London, Ontario.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 63 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah the cops on this side of the pond are crazy, and their leadership staff tend to fall a lot further into the “complete psycho” side of the human spectrum.

Thanks for sharing that story though - the dichotomy is absolutely fucking wild, especially considering we’re talking about Northern Ireland.

[-] tpihkal@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

How often are police tipped off before hand that someone is anticipating being SWATed though?

That situation is practically unheard of so it's impossible to know how police in the US would respond.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, that’s definitely a quandary. But in the case of people who know they might be (or have been previously) targeted with that sort of bullshit, it’s a prudent precaution in the US (and Canada too, evidently)

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

How on earth are these psychos able to find streamers' actual addresses?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zante@lemmy.wtf 15 points 10 months ago

Regular riots in Northern Ireland. ?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 109 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, I guess if someone calls and says you have kidnapped a little girl and that they have seen you with a gun, the police can't take a chance that it's hoax. All phone numbers that call the police should be logged and if it turns out to be a hoax, traced, so people who make hoax calls can be arrested and prosecuted.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago

If they enter his home, and there is no evidence of a crime, then what is the basis for the arrest?
One thing is to investigate the truth of a call, another is to act on it as if it's verbatim truth.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 67 points 10 months ago

Usually swat teams break a lot of your shit, maybe kill a baby, and then leave without arresting you.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 35 points 10 months ago

Don’t need to arrest the suspect if they’re dead taps forehead

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago

Oh AND leave you with the bill

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Or toss a flash bang in the crib.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 13 points 10 months ago

After breaking down the wrong door

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

Was he arrested? I don't see follow up. It only says he was handcuffed which would be standard until they know what's going on.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

OK, here it's the other way around, you don't normally handcuff somebody unless they are arrested.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 38 points 10 months ago

You get handcuffed as a precaution. You do not have to be arrested. You can het handcuffed on a traffic stop if the officer decides they have cause to search your car. Etc.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 58 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Some cops will go a step further and shoot you first; as a precaution, of course.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 31 points 10 months ago

Or your dog. Safety first!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] freewheel@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

It's not technically an arrest. In a high-stakes call, the police will typically detain everybody until they can figure out what's going on. That means potential victims as well as potential attackers. It's a safety measure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 10 months ago

They are logged, but swatting people get around it. They are suspicious “looking” calls, but so are bomb threats.

Swatting is pretty much always a blocked number to a non-emergency line. If they are traced it is typically one of those free online voip services. It takes work and access to really get from A to B, which is why it only happens when there are awful results.

In the US at least, 911 gets special access and calling it will always get you to your local dispatch (unless you have voip with the wrong account address). Non-emergency is just a normal phone number. If someone wants to call from out of the area or hide their number, non-emergency is how they have to do it. This is suspicious because in a real situation like “I just shot my dad” or whatever they say, nobody is taking time to look up non-emergency.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

If this is legal then it's a giant gaping loophole in the system. Not just because it's easy to harass someone but because it sounds incredibly easy for a cop to call in an "anonymous tip" on someone they suspected of wrongdoing but had no evidence to support it. I'm almost positive the Supreme Court has even held that evidence that was gathered in the course of raiding the wrong building is legal as it's an "honest mistake".

[-] mbirth@lemmy.ml 34 points 10 months ago

In the comments the victim said that the police said it were two emails they got. Not even a call.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tabular@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

How often does it end up saving peoples lives though?

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't know - but I'm willing to get the instances where people were saved weren't calls from anonymous voip numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 10 months ago

This is such an obviously dumb take its unbelievabe anyone would come up with it. Ofcourse the cops need to respond to a call of someone claiming to be assaulted/abused/murdered. There is no issue with this at all. The issue that CAN arise is that bad police training might lead to someone getting actually hurt in a raid like this. But thats an entirely different issue.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Ofcourse the cops need to respond

Yes, but then there's the matter of HOW they respond.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Quackdoc@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I strongly disagree with this. Police should be given permission to do these things. Very rapidly with little evidence so long as they're handled right.

In fact, this is one of those cases where it looks like it was handled right. He went to the door, came in, and it sounds like they were invited in. He was not arrested immediately and thrown to the ground. Yes it sucks, But there are very much very many cases where it is absolutely necessary.

Rather than them not being able to do it, I absolutely believe they should be allowed to do it. Just be more strict on how it's handled.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Maybe this was done properly, but I was thrown off by the handcuff bit, here it's not normal to handcuff somebody who cooperates.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

To make more money for the weapons manufacturers.

SWAT teams didn't always exist. Many would argued they should not exist. But if they no longer exited, police would spend less money in military style equipment.

Police don't care if SWATing is harming people. They just need to keep their expenses high, and SWAT teams are great for that.

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
700 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

57081 readers
566 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS