681
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

It seems odd to turn to Oshkosh to build these. I wonder how they compare to Amazon's Rivian vans.

[-] SnotFlickerman 10 points 3 months ago

I mean... the previous ones were by Northop Grumman?

Is it really a shock that the US turns to defense companies for this kind of thing?

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There was a time when these were built by Jeep/AMC motors. People used to buy these used at auction and drive them after they were retired. And electric delivery vehicles are already built by companies like Rivian and Ford, though I don’t know what the cost difference is.

I would think building a “bespoke” vehicle for USPS would result in more expensive service parts. But I don’t know what kind of service contracts are included with these.

[-] SnotFlickerman 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The Grumman LLVs were "bespoke" and have been being used since the 80's??

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, and before that they were a general jeep vehicle built by built by Jeep/AMC. They sold the contract to LTV in 1980.

https://www.onallcylinders.com/2018/07/04/neither-snow-nor-rain-a-brief-history-of-the-postal-mail-jeep/

[-] SnotFlickerman 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And talking about the US prior to the military industrial complex and post military industrial complex are two different things.

Post WWII its been a revolving door of "defense" company executives having high positions in government.

Remember VP Dick Cheney, former CEO of Halliburton? Remember Halliburton getting no-bid contracts to rebuild Iraq?

My point is: this is the norm now.

Is it stupid? Yes. It is a result of the growth of the power of the military industrial complex? Also yes. Is it what you ought to expect based on past behavior? Fucking obviously.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Bespoke in that they were essentially S-10 pickups with different bodies.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

True, but I don't think it's had any link to the aerospace company for a very long time, right?

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Rivian doesn't have the production capacity or the knowledge of navigating federal-level bureaucracy. I'd also rather it go to Rivian but I understand why they didn't. I doubt that even Tesla could do it.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Is the rollout happening that quickly? How many are they building in a year? I also can't imagine a company used to building MRAPs can churn vehicles out faster than a conventional automaker...

[-] Badabinski@kbin.earth 3 points 3 months ago

I'd guess there's a bit of MIC lobbying and chicanery afoot here. Like, it does seem like Oshkosh makes some good vehicles, but there's always pressure to support defense companies when government bidding happens.

Please note that this is completely baseless speculation on my part. I'm an idiot on the internet that knows fuck-all about shit.

[-] SnotFlickerman 1 points 3 months ago

My first thought as well. This is par for the course in modern US.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
681 points (100.0% liked)

News

23634 readers
2637 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS