493
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 202 points 2 months ago

Its still a tight race in the swing states. Crazy to think anyone supports this guy. He has no respect for the country, or anyone in it. There's so many people blindly voting against their own interests. I just don't get it.

[-] bashbeerbash@lemmy.world 140 points 2 months ago

25 years of organized propaganda (fox news, talk radio, etc.). I live amongst Trump supporters, they truly believe prices will come down and they will make more money.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 110 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

my mom believes that we're being "invaded" by illegals. i said, "stop using that term. it's offensive and racist."

"that's what they are. they broke the law," she shot back.

"and you're offensive and racist. and i suppose that means you're an illegal, too, since you jaywalked earlier?" I replied.

"illegal immigrants are felons!" she shouted at me.

"like Trump? so, he's a 34-times illegal, then? and you're voting for him?"

"that's different!" she screamed

there's no reasoning with these people

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 61 points 2 months ago

You can't reason people out of a position they didn't reason themselves into

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Ain’t that a fucking truth. Ironically, it was my grandfather, my mother’s father, who first told me that

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

my favorite wisdom that has been passed down and not followed is: "Don't believe everything you see on the Internet"

Gullible turds.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

trump the illegal, I like it.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Third generation draft dodger.

His grandfather escaped Germany so he didn't get drafted for WWI.

All in the family.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago

Ivan the terrible.

Putin the humiliated.

Trump the illegal.

[-] aruraios@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

To give Ivan some credit, his title is so old that it originally meant something more like Ivan the Terri_fying_

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's my understanding that illegally entering the country is a misdemeanor, and illegally reentering the country is a felony. It is an amplifying action for a huge number of other felonies though. Am I wrong? 8* Usc section 1325 vs 8 Usc section 1326.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

It was always my understanding that entering the country to claim asylum was not illegal at all

[-] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

It's also a civil violation, not a criminal one.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 2 months ago

Not all laws are just.

I was on a grand jury once and most of the charges were for marijuana. I tried to convince the jury we should nullify, because sending teenagers to jail for pot is cruel. No one took me up on this. (A grand jury is simple majority, and the defense has no role in the proceedings. Side note: every time a cop isn't indicated it's because the prosecutor didn't want to.)

There was a little old white lady who sat behind me on the jury. She said well that's the law and if it's bad we should change it. Fine, I said. But imagine it's 1950 and you're on a trial for a black man who sat at an all white's counter. Would you indict? Would that be the right thing to do?

She went, "oh.. mm I don't know". And I don't think she meant because of peer pressure or imagining she only had the perspective of a white person from the 50s. I think she was just a very Lawful-Neutral person.

Anyway. The point I was trying to get at is a lot of people have garbage moral reasoning.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

Fox News is absolutely one of the cause, but we can’t ignore Rush Limbaugh. He corrupted SO MANY people over the years, it’s absurd. I feel like a lot of people forget about that.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

yep, racism is a helluva drug. It's the poor brown peoples' fault, not the billionaires who actually decide what happens.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago

Conservatives live on symbols. The Bible, the Constitution, the flag. They don’t even understand them and don’t need to because it’s really all about their emotions. They are in it to win and to feel confident, not to rule.

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago

Team sports.

"My team win, your team lose."

The extent of their thought process.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

this is why high school pep rallies were invented-- it takes a special kind of stupid to bleat about "individual liberty" while pledging your soul to a party of collectivist ultranationalism which "others" everyone who doesn't toe the line

[-] finley@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

you are free to do as we say, or else

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

"We are free to do what we want, and we are free to tell you what to do."

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

"Freedom to do what we want! Freedom for you to do what we want."

[-] Lost_My_Mind@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago

More like if their team win EVERYONE loses.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

For them thats not a bug, thats a feature. "Zero sum" is baked into the foundation of conservative ideology and policy. For them to win, you have to lose. If you we are winning somehow, that must mean they are losing somehow and to them that is not acceptable even if they have no way of quantifying or qualify how they would be losing.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 19 points 2 months ago

Nobody asked him to run in 2016... he only did because he thought he could hustle the donation process to pay back his debts to Russia, but then the whole of GOP decided to back him, because who else could they unite on?

GOP is a coalition of people who can only find common ground with others on the absolutely lowest common denominator. Trump is just that. The uninvited but seemingly popular stranger at a party where everyone hates each other.

The look on his face when he won... He never intended to win. Now he has to, because he fucked up, and will need the power to dodge the consequences..

If Democrats win it is clear that the GOP party is fucking over. They might actually break up into different directions if they lose hard enough.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago

no respect for the country, or anyone in it.

that's why those people love trump. because the venn diagram of people he hates somewhat overlaps the circle of people they hate. and since they're stupid, it doesn't even matter that they are themselves within the circle of people trump hates

[-] Lost_My_Mind@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

Kind of like Hitler saying "We kill all non-Blonde haired blue eye'd Aryan Germans" and then the Japanese were like "May we join in?"

If Hitler had won, there would have been a Nazi/German War sometime in the 60s, after he sent all the Russians to concentration camps, and taken over all of Russia.

Granted, I'm veering off into alternate history, but you can see my point, right?

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

why turn to alternate history when actual history works just fine?

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.

https://phdn.org/archives/www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/documents/osssection3pt1.htm

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
493 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2258 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS