Exactly. Let's hope we get to have another bad US election rather than this being the last one.
Doesn't all authority already lie with the USA? If we're going to be real, I mean. I'm sure France thinks otherwise but let's be real: NATO was always the "Uncle Sam will protect Europe from Russia"-treaty.
Not a lot. The British weapons are reliant on US maintenance. Won't be credible for long if the US doesn't support them.
I hope we'll be able to do this again. There are worse alternatives.
South Korea gets nukes in 3, 2, 1...
Nobody wants to be on the naughty-list of a person this powerful. Even if he loses, the Republican party and all its office-holding members will still to some degree answer to him. He's not someone you want to pick a fight with unless you are willing to sacrifice something.
The reasons you'd ever want an Xbox used to be Halo and Fable. Now it's, uh, I dunno, does anyone care about Starfield?
Funding issues, according to the article
Gosh darnit, people. You're all thinking of this as civilian tech. Just as we all know every military needs a satellite navigation system a la GPS to guide rockets and what not, with the Ukraine war it's become painfully obvious that every military needs a satellite communications system a la Starlink. China and India are inevitably going to launch their own systems soon. Russia too, if it has any money left after this war. That's how you have to think of this system.
This is such a weird nothingburger. Not very radioactive water released in a massive ocean. Will have no effect on anything.
I'm sure it's possible, but it's not going to come for free nor will it be immediate