290
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zer0@programming.dev 108 points 2 years ago

To be fair, arch could look like that after a few days.

[-] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 2 years ago

NixOS is like that every day for no reason

[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Oh, you updated one byte in your config? Better download the entire ducking Internet and rebuild everything!

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago

staging rebuild cycles only happen every two weeks or so.

The reason is always that something changed and causes all dependent packages to change, requiring a rebuild of those too.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 47 points 2 years ago

Read the Arch news before clicking "yes".

[-] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

I have Informant installed for this. Saved my hide a few times.

[-] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

people laughed at me for choosing debian. they asked why i chose to have ancient runes running in my computer

who's laughing now?

[-] lemmus@szmer.info 11 points 1 year ago

Still we, dinosaur.🦖

[-] PushButton@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

We are still laughing, no worries.

p.s. Debian is great, I am just a "kind of new" void converted.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Sometimes I wish someone would make a an Arch box and come back to it years later to see the updates it has missed.

But that's assuming an Arch box would be reliable enough to stay alive that long lol.

Always heard of 20+ year old bsd and debian machines chugging along with no issue.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

It won't rise much beyond that, since you only get one update per package. Whether it's upgrading Firefox from version 120 to 121 or to version 130, it doesn't change much in terms of download size, nor the number of updates.

At least, I assume, Arch doesn't do differential updates. On some of the slower-moving distributions, they only make you download the actual changes to the files within the packages. In that case, jumping to 121 vs. 130 would make more of a difference.

If you do want lots of package updates, you need lots of packages. The texlive-full package is always a fun one in that regard...

[-] nous@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago

I have updated arch systems that had not been powered on for years before. It was fine. No issues what so ever. Arch is not some flaky distro that breaks if you look away for a minute. My main system has had had the same install for over 5 years now and I regularly forget to update it for months at a time. Again, no issues.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah really the biggest issue I could see is pacman’s keyring being so out of date that it has to be manually refreshed with a new one

[-] Yuki@kutsuya.dev 10 points 2 years ago

My arch install has been going strong for about 5 years now

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

I had that on a physical machine! It broke hardcore lol I had to reinstall the OS after trying to update

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] datendefekt@feddit.org 21 points 2 years ago

You see, this is why atomic desktops aren't a bad idea.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago

This has nothing to do with immutable desktops.

[-] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

Well in an immutable distro, there is little to no chance for the system to end up in an unusable state (I guess it is the same for distros which apply the updates atomically). Traditional distros are far more likely to bork when so much shit is updated at once

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

I don't think this is true. The package manager is there for a reason to prevent that. If you have more updates to install at a time, then the chances are the same as if you would have installed the problematic update one at a time. Just read the manual intervention information from Arch and see if there is something to do, then it won't bork. If people don't know what they are doing and do not read the additional information (that is required to do so on Arch), well yes, then you could end up borking your machine. But not because so many updates are installed at a time. The package manager and operating system and their maintainer designed it in a way that you can install ton of updates at a time without borking. This is fine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago

It's arch. There'll be no issue here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 years ago

I did this regularly on arch. And it didn't end very well.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Remembers Tumbleweed fondly

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

This is why I Dont use rolling release Distros on Pcs i wont use often.

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I used to care but with recovery tools being what they are and most apps being containers... my base systems tend to be a little more disposable.

That said, I haven't had problems, even if I am at risk for more of them. I have my snapshots and my backups.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Because you get updates and have an up to date system?

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Because you get a update once a update for a package comes out, If you dont update for a very long time you need to download a very large update.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Haskell packages every other day...

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 years ago
[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 26 points 2 years ago

arch linux, i'm sshed from my debian machine.

[-] jwt@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

And they're red, that means the offer is about to expire. Better act quick!

[-] eugenia@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Better apt quick!

[-] PoorlyWrittenPapyrus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

You wouldn’t believe the shit I’ve seen on internet connected production servers…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Nah, just update it.

[-] nomen_dubium@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

welp, looks like you don't use python virtualenvs... well i guess jokes on you all your shit is probably broken now (and as a bonus, that's probably a big part of the donwload size as well) :p

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 4 points 1 year ago

Probably should, but this machine is already cluttered terribly. A good bit of the download size is likely Pytorch files.

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Looks like a !!FUN!! time in Dwarf Fortress.

[-] vort3@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Those are rookie numbers.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

6.5 gigs. "Proceed with installation? y/n"

Yeah, I guess. Fark getting any work done today.

[-] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Recently updated a nixos machine that was on the shelf for five years or so. A few options and packages had been renamed, fixed those, upgrade completed with zero problems.

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 5 points 1 year ago

Only issue with this update was a maintainer's keyring had expired and been replaced, so his packages didn't pass the signing check. After re-installing the keyring, the whole think works fine.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
290 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

65485 readers
442 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS