Paizo Blog: Player Core Preview: The Wizard, Remastered by tempestuousknave in c/pf2general@pathfinder.social
Is picking a lock harder than it should be? by tempestuousknave in c/pf2general@pathfinder.social
[-] tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the good input everybody.

(at least) 2 things I was missing: Replacement picks being 3SP/negligible bulk, and critical successes.

I think Merwyn has an excellent point about the rolls being excessive when there's no time constraints, but I could see how the rolling could build tension when the rogue is trying to break into a dockside warehouse and the paladin is trying to distract the nightwatchman.

The gaminess of pick tracking is not fun, but I'd just say to buy a hundred, and instead of measuring them in qty measure them in the extra round lost fishing a replacement from your pack.

Is picking a lock harder than it should be? by tempestuousknave in c/pf2general@pathfinder.social
[-] tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

It's a pretty realistic expectation for a mediocre locksmith in the real world faced with the average door lock. It's a bit slow for the fantasy expert lock picking thief who's invested their ability and skill increases to excel at a mundane and achievable task. But time spent is the smaller issue.

And it's 3 gp a thieves tool set, but the bigger issue is bulk. God forbid you've a dozen doors with good locks in a dungeon, that's 4 bulk worth of picks to get through--pretty much the thiefs whole inventory--and a 50 percent chance of ultimate failure (not to mention 240d20). Pretty rough on the class fantasy. If nothing else I'd change the names of the locks to pad the thief ego: poor becomes average, average good, good master and master legendary. I don't want my player stymied by an average door because he only brought one backup toolkit.

12
Is picking a lock harder than it should be? (2e.aonprd.com)
submitted 1 year ago by tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network to c/pf2general@pathfinder.social
10 comments fedilink

A level 5 rogue will quite probably have a thievery dc of 13, if they invest in it and max dex. The average lock has a dc of 25 and requires 4 successes. It takes a roll of 12 or better to have a single success, and will average about 9 rolls to rack up those 4 successes. With 9 rolls wherein you crit fail on a 2 or lower, the likelihood of breaking a pick is ~61%.

Should a level 5 rogue take a minute to open the average lock, and more likely than not break a pick in the process?

And let's look at a good Lock: DC 30, requiring 5 successes. The level 5 rogue will only succeed on a 17, meaning it will take on average 20 attempts to get those 5 successes. On one attempt in a thousand our Lvl 5 rogue will open this lock before breaking a pick, and will typically break 3 in the process.

Am I missing something?

I could write for WotC by tempestuousknave in c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
[-] tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago

In Icewind Dale it was a Loris. No other text was changed.

Minor Illusion Ruling: revelation does not require an action by tempestuousknave in c/dndnext@ttrpg.network
[-] tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

The question of fog/darkness/beaded curtains is an interesting one, thanks for bringing that to my attention, would have co. I wouldn't rule darkness as being superior to fog cloud (provided they're both silent images) Both will be dispelled by physical interaction.

When I explained my ruling a clever player asked all physical interaction. I overconfidently answered affirmatively, and they said "what about precipitation?" LOL. House rule, rain reveals it for viewers within 10 feet, snow for viewers within 20. Only minor illusion, silent image can fake the interaction.

Minor Illusion Ruling: revelation does not require an action by tempestuousknave in c/dndnext@ttrpg.network
[-] tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago

Solid argument, you've just changed my ruling!

Minor Illusion Ruling: revelation does not require an action by tempestuousknave in c/dndnext@ttrpg.network
[-] tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

I try to keep npc reactions to solid-snaking pc's appropriately tiered:

  • Apparate a crate over yourself while in melee? First enemy attack is disadvantage, second straight.
  • Apparate a crate to hide in a PC's house? Definitely getting investigated on sight.
  • Apparate a crate in a packed warehouse - likely to go unnoticed.
Shadowbladelock by tempestuousknave in c/3d6@ttrpg.network
[-] tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

This is neat. I like the idea of a cleric that got a hold of a relic that got a hold of the cleric, fun rp potential. Shadowblade/twilight is a lot nicer for the party than the classic shadowblade/magical-darkness. Still not the best fit but you've done a lot to shore up the weaknesses. Thanks for indulging me.

6
Shadowbladelock (ttrpg.network)
submitted 1 year ago by tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network to c/3d6@ttrpg.network
3 comments fedilink

Warlock wielding shadow blade. Obviously there are stronger things to concentrate on, but do your worst within parameters.

14
Minor Illusion Ruling: revelation does not require an action (ttrpg.network)
submitted 1 year ago by tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network to c/dndnext@ttrpg.network
7 comments fedilink

Minor illusion:

You create a sound or an image of an object within range that lasts for the duration. The illusion also ends if you dismiss it as an action or cast this spell again.

If you create a sound, its volume can range from a whisper to a scream. It can be your voice, someone else's voice, a lion's roar, a beating of drums, or any other sound you choose. The sound continues unabated throughout the duration, or you can make discrete sounds at different times before the spell ends.

If you create an image of an object--such as a chair, muddy footprints, or a small chest--it must be no larger than a 5-foot cube. The image can't create sound, light, smell, or any other sensory effect. Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion, because things can pass through it.

If a creature uses its action to examine the sound or image, the creature can determine that it is an illusion with a successful Intelligence (Investigation) check against your spell save DC. If a creature discerns the illusion for what it is, the illusion becomes faint to the creature.

-Physical interaction with the image reveals it to be an illusion.

Not an action spent physically interacting, but physical interaction. An arrow strikes the image? Revealed to observers. You use an object interaction to touch the illusion? Revealed to observers.

-If a creature uses its action to examine the sound or image, the creature can determine that it is an illusion with a successful Intelligence (Investigation) check against your spell save DC.

If, not only if. This could reveal the illusion without physical interaction, and is particularly useful if the illusion was behind a window of out of range.

tempestuousknave

joined 1 year ago