[-] sabin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I ended up coding my own.

Lots of stuff I'd want in an applications launcher on hyperland. I'd need it to have all the functions of the important system indicators and essentially take the role of the top panel in gnome.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Fuck this platform.

Fuck mandatory DRM.

Fuck the garbage runtime that takes minutes to start every time I wanna play a goddamn single player game.

Fuck mandatory updates every time I want to play a goddamn single player game.

Fuck popup advertisements for events that reappear year by year no matter how many times I've disabled them

This platform prevents you from owning anything..

I don't know how anyone could support this garbage.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

That's not the same as content distribution.

Sharing content to clients cannot be effectively done through creative cloud.

It does not make sense to try and stop the distribution at the level of video editing. Not only is the thought of child predators making regular use of professional editing software completely absurd, but even if you assume they do, why the fuck do you think they would use the inbuilt cloud sharing tools to do so?? They would just encrypt the contents and transmit it over any other file sharing service...

It makes no sense to implement this measure because it does absolutely nothing to impede criminals, but enables a company well known for egregious privacy violations unprecedented access to information completely law abiding clients have legitimate reasons to want to keep private.

It is a farce. A smokescreen intended to encroach on customers precious data all the while doing nothing to assist law enforcement.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Adobe is not a video distribution platform. They do not have this level of culpability.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

Sounds like a smokescreen to me. All file sharing services have this problem. The solution is to respond to subpoena requests and let the government do their jobs. They do not have to allow themselves to arbitrarily violate their users privacy in order to do that.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Back when the British mandate was established the Jews purchased the land they occupied from the Ottomans. There isn't really much cause to suggest war crimes were committed until after said mandate ended and all the surrounding Arab states decided to declare war.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

In short it's essentially a protocol that defines what type of requests must be sent between applications and a compositor.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Nothing was misguided and if anything your tone deaf attempt to double down only proves the point I'm making.

This stopped being about human deaths for you a long time ago.

Let's not even bother to ask the question of whether or not this guy could ultimately be saving lives. All that matters to you is that you have a target to take your anger out on the event that a loved one dies in an accident or something.

You are shallow beyond belief.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

Problems with this app go beyond just privacy and bleed into national security.

You as a citizen of your country have an obligation to not freely offer yourself up as an attack vector for cybercriminals all so you could fry your brain with garbage media.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

So you'd rather live in a world where people die more often, just so you can punish the people who do the killing?

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Lol no. If jesus was alive today he'd be telling you that poor people nowadays live exceptional lives and should be complacent in having their lives exploited. Jesus did not free slaves- he only cured them so they could keep providing capital to their masters.

view more: next ›

sabin

joined 6 months ago