Yeah, I guess. Does it pertain to first degree murder? And could it just devolve into a juridical fight? 'cause then I think it turns into whoever has more money to spend wins, so... What I'm suggesting is that we, the people, agree all-together to not rat the gunman (or -woman) out to the pigs.
Anyone else feel like we should give the gunman a free pass, btw?
just one more SSRI bro, i promise bro the next SSRI will work bro please i need one more SSRI bro Edit: okay, well maybe instead of insinuating that none of the SSRIs work, I should have claimed that all of them so many potentially crippling side effects, that prescribing these "medications" should be considered significantly more as an absolute last-resort solution - together with inpatient care - than be given out like candy as they are today. But I also understand that it is the cheapest option available, as the best option is therapy, which there are multiple of, all of them requiring quite a lot of time and work, all of which cost significantly more than what anyone is ready to pay. But that shit is long, so take it as you will
oh, please don't. please, pretty please?
How to create government jobs, while also remaining a christofascist overlord. Just like old times, eh?
Once again, every accusation is a confession.
Eat the rich. Or, and hear me out, let's first keep a bunch of baboons hungry for a while, then group up all of the ultra-rich and the fascists (which, I suspect, if made into a Venn-diagram would be just a circle), then throw those pitiful (but, thankfully, not pitiful enough) excuses for human beings one after another to the baboons until either the baboons are satiated, or we've run out of meat.
"a cult of hate and exploitation." no wonder they've found a strong foothold in the US then! Not only do those seem to thrive there naturally, but nowadays they also seem to be encouraged to do so.
Haha, oh wow. You guys over there really are fucked.
True, hence the question marks.