[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 69 points 5 days ago

Officials want to be clear the man who is shot was never charged, never arrested and has fully cooperated with the investigation.

This is apparently something that needs to be said when talking about shooting unarmed people.

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Not a fan of Musk at all, but Lidar is quite expensive. A 64 line lidar with 100m+ range was about 30k+ a few years ago (not sure how prices have changed now). The long range lidar on the top of the Waymo car is probably even higher resolution than this. It's likely that the sensor suite + compute platform on the waymo car costs way more than the actual Jaguar base vehicle itself, though waymo manufactures it's own lidars. I think it would have been impossible to keep the costs of Teslas within the general public's reach if they had done that. Of course, deploying a self driving/L2+ solution without this sensor fidelity is also questionable.

I agree that perception models will not be able deal with this well for a while. They are just not good enough at estimating depth information. That being said, a few other companies also attempted "vision-only" solutions. TuSimple (the autonomous trucking company) argued at some point that lidar didn't offer enough range for their solution since semi trucks need a lot more time to slow down/react to events ahead because of their massive inertia.

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I agree that they'll be criticized either way, though it is debatable which would have the worst outcome.

That being said, the US was a major driving force for the creation of Israel, has armed and funded them since, and has protected Israel in the Security Council preventing any international check on their actions . So, most certainly, it was not the US's problem to begin with, but given US foreign policy for the past 70 years it is inextricably linked to the problem now.

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

I guess in katakana "gorogoro" would be ゴロゴロ, which when written vertically in two lines would look vaguely like 8/8? Just guessing...

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And loads of mongooses too!

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I'm sure you don't mean to offend, but the phrase "whole civilized world" being used to describe just the US + parts of western Europe is questionable at the very best.

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah I see, thanks for the correction! (It also kind of demonstrates the problems I have with my own language :P)

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My language is diglossic - it has a written form and a spoken form that are very different to each other. It's quite difficult to understand the written form if you've only grown up speaking and listening to the language, as the written form is essentially the language as spoken in the 1600s.

To compare it to English, it would be like saying "Where are you?" to someone over the phone, but then having to send them "Wherefore art thou?" as a text.

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree most of them do have a hard 'T', but "talwar" (I'm guessing this is the word you're referring to) is pronounced with a "th". Probably the words for "firecracker" (pataka) or "holiday" (chuttee) are more representative.

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It has a lot to do with AI. Their systems use a lot of deep learning etc to recognize agents/obstacles on the road (perception), to infer how the agents will move in the future (prediction), and to generate trajectories for their car (motion planning). It definitely isn't Artificial General Intelligence, but it is most certainly AI.

[-] mongoosedadei@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If by "brought about positive changes", you mean that it's allowed colonial powers to enrich themselves enormously while draining their colonies of wealth, leaving millions to starve and destabilizing regions for generations, then yes perhaps you're right. The argument you used could be applied in exactly the same way to justify slavery. The positive changes here always favour the oppressor, never the oppressed.

view more: next ›

mongoosedadei

joined 1 year ago