The subscription lets you use the App ad free and some other bits like their food guide, and most of the time it’s real journalism without the usual right wing bias… which apparently makes it left wing… but to me it’s just center/apolitical.
The Guardian does a weekly magazine of their long form articles. I’ve impulse bought it a few times when going on long journeys and it’s very good.
I’ve considered subscribing but it’s £18 per month (discounted from £27 for the 1st year) and that’s a lot for me.
My primary responsibility is to the animal I am caring for, who has no choice but to eat what I give them.
You might be happy to know we have replaced her afternoon duck stick with a carrot.
Having read a lot around this, and even just beyond the headline of the linked article, please be cautious with your furry friends.
The actual stance is “possible, but not recommended”
I’ve come to the conclusion that although I’m going to try and reduce my meat intake with a view to a complete switch to more sustainable options, I’m not going to mess with my dogs diet.
If a peer-reviewed study from an actual canine dietitian comes to light which confirms a plant based diet product is at least as healthy as a meat based diet, I’m happy to change my mind.
It’s obvious people have not read the article which refers to cases where the decision was made years ago under the Tory government. Future bed and board payments are being reviewed and expected to be scrapped.
In this case he was awarded £650k compensation and £37k was deducted from that.
I understand the line in the sand where the country has been bankrupted and just can’t revisit every bad decision made over the last 15 years and pay up, there isn’t the money or the court time.
Unfortunately this article is written to stoke hate for the current government, I’m just offering the alternative bias.
Windows defender?
Seriously you don’t need anything else, it’s really lightweight and Microsoft uses it to enhance their paid for corporate offerings. Anything more is just expensive bloatware for 99.9% of users.
Edit: Kaspersky has been banned in several countries because it may be a Russian Trojan program.
Is YouTube actively trying to make their platform as unusable as possible?
In case you can’t zoom the YouTube definition of ‘latest’, is any time in the last few years.
My video suggestions are also 50% text posts now for some reason.
What kind of backhanded EV misinformation bullshit is this?
Electric, gas, petrol, hydrogen, diesel, cooking oil or vodka; what you put in your car to make it go makes no difference to the tires or the wear.
The company that provides your banks phone system has full access to pretty much every piece of information your bank holds on you, including call recordings, phone numbers, addresses, debts, credits, and your phone password. We can trick our own systems into thinking it’s you on the phone.
Avoid calling your bank at all costs, and if they call you say “no thank you I’ll do that online or in branch”, as soon as you pass security the phone system is accessing all your data. If possible go into branch or do everything on a banking app which has far better security.
On some things the UK is progressive, on other issues, like sustainable transport, they see it as antisocial behaviour.
I very rarely downvote people but @RobotToaster you are just posting the most gutterish drivel. We get you don’t like Labour but if you insist on posting here please try to elevate the quality of your sources and commentary. 57p for the graphic sounds like the sort of bargain we need after 14 years of corrupt Tory contracts.
News in UK today said car insurance for young drivers is now £3000 a year on average ($4000USD)
Which is fine… until YouTube premium gets a massive price increase to try and capitalise on subscription apathy.
The title is misleading, this is new legalisation, the current amount that has to be refunded is £0.
It’s in consultation, £415k would be nice… but £85k is still better than nothing, and will fully protect the vast majority of fraud victims.