If this is how badly people take on the propaganda when they know it's fiction, imagine how terribly indoctrinated people are in-universe

Better that than hot food just getting hotter and hotter till the room catches fire

Their users often argue for authoritarian regimes and deny genocides.

Perhaps telling all his employees that if Trump won he'd cut their bonuses would be taken as attempting to threaten their vote?

In Germany Hitler only got around a third of the vote. Trump is winning the popular vote.

TBF, that trope was established back when you could get all the way to the gate before showing your ticket.

It might be funny to see it subverted by catching them at modern security, though

Having your own domain is pretty cool, even if it's just a single page with some text and links to social media profiles.

Or say that they will eventually.

I pictured literal sheep in Halloween masks at first. I thought it was just insane person Facebook.

If I did see a whole flock of sheep in Halloween masks, I would have something to say...

One of the default subs in Canada seems entirely dedicated to xenophobia.

What happened to the first r/CanadianHousing🤔

The article does not link the study. It can be found linked from the authors site (https://www.mattmotta.com/publications) here: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/qmbkv/

Honestly, it's more worth reading than the article. It's 7 pages, not including references and data.

I was wondering who the 2,200 people were. From the study:

Data

Data for this study are derived from a nationally representative online survey of N = 2,200 US adults, conducted between March 30 - April 10, 2023. We administered this study in partnership with YouGov...

...YouGov did this for our study by first pulling a simple random sample of responses from nationally representative US Census data, ...These individuals were then invited to participate in our study.

The firm then corrected for any remaining deviations ... on the basis of respondents’ racial identity, gender identity, age, educational attainment, and 2020 US Presidential vote choice.

Stage 1 Results: The Prevalence and Politicization of CVH

We begin our analysis by considering the prevalence of CVH among dog owners. As Table 3 demonstrates, a large minority of dog owners consider vaccines administered to dogs to be unsafe (37%), ineffective (22%), and/or unnecessary (30%). Correspondingly, we find that a slight majority of dog owners (53%) can be considered to be vaccine hesitant; i.e., because they endorse at least one of these three positions (see: Measures)

This view has existed for a long time and has been used to limit women's freedom to travel, and make them ride in much more dangerous sidesaddles.