[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 1 points 54 seconds ago

Good way to go! And if you're really technically ept and have no friends, don't use arch but rather the average systemd-free glibc-free and ofc bloatless distro. That'll get you occupied for a while.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago

Yes, but that's a common thing, probably taken from a reddit thread and made into an overreaction to pull someone in the dirt.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

Yes, but still everything else will go to them. So deletion is the only right step.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I don't think that would make that much more difference hence why I deleted it and probably my data too.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

That's the cost of comfort.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Probably not that good, because unless your bank can be run fully through the web it will probably detect exactly the same (maybe more) things that wouldn't go through on things like Graphene.

67
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by lenocolomo@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I'd wish to be as private in my digital surrounding as possibly. That sometimes means being judged for many things, having to deal with misinformation, false assumptions and the classic: Dumb people who just don't accept things.

While I have lost many contacts of people (or just any withstanding contact to them) and online friends in my digital viscinity, I have heard a lot of downright bull.

Including that reacurrant phrase of people saying: "Why do you want to be more private, what do you have to hide?" And this sentence just bugs me - partly because of the unwillingness to learn and the misinformation (propaganda) companies like Meta share through things like this. While finally deleting my instagram account, I stumbled upon this. (picture) Notice how the title is:

"Privacy on Instagram"

And from the next sentence onward it's just talking about

"safety and security"

of data.

The thing that many people don't get, is that I do like my data with me. And even if my criminal slate is empty, I do not need companies like Meta (and pretty much EVERY other company through selling data) to know all of that. At this point they know more about me than what my dog knows of me.

Yeah, it just pisses me off. Thanks for letting me share a peace of mind.

P.S. I just realised that some of the help center links have NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

We'll be here in a year again. Maybe not the year after, but probably the next after that one too. This is humanity and what it's turning to. We got to finally face it.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

This. This is what it's all about.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 days ago

Fckin awful. And why did they get off with it? Yes, because they're rich.

[-] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 week ago

While I get that, it is still unfortunate that no open-source, trusted variant can be part of the usual ways.

view more: next ›

lenocolomo

joined 1 week ago