Non-profit means the corporation isn't set up to make a profit and the business operates off of donations instead of selling a product. So there is always a profit motive. I wish more people understood this. Everything from Greenpeace to MADD is still a corporation ran by people who want to make lots and lots of cash.

I'm trying to discuss things in pure logic so as to emotionally unload the reasoning. Bad faith means they are being deceitful. Whether someone says "Hello. You look nice to day." or "we should torture indigenous people" how can one glean that they don't truly believe that? Though the second one is so outlandish, I would assume it's satire since I assume innocence.

Unless you’re reducing bad faith actors to people coming up and saying, ‘‘hey everyone, I’m acting in bad faith!’’ (which the vast majority of bad faith actors do not do) - which is ridiculous.

It's been my experience they eventually do. If someone is telling me I look nice and I take it as a genuine compliment, but they're acting in bad faith, that's going to drive them up the fucking wall that I'm so dumb that I don't assume bad faith like they do.

Even with an ethical element tied to the statement, an accusation of bad faith is a bit of a non sequitur.

A: We should torture ducks and masturbate to their suffering because they have three feet.

B: You are acting in bad faith.

I'm using 7.5 which I installed in 2023. Have they really had 20 updates in two years or am I'm misunderstanding the numbering?

In Threads, WWIII starts when Russia invades Iran after a US backed coup.

In some discussions, faith, good or bad, doesn’t matter. If a politician says that ducks have three feet, whether they say that in good faith or not, it’s wrong. So it’s still best to assume good faith and logically explain how it is incorrect. To respond to such a statement with an accusation is a fallacy.

The real problem is children on the Internet. The real solution is getting parents to use parental control software.

If you're a full grown adult using Facebook, much less addicted to it, ya get what ya deserve.

Another option is to not use Twtich. There's literally a jillion other things to do online.

When one assumes bad faith, one is assuming guilt. That isn’t fair. I have found it better to assume innocence, to adopt Judge Blackstone’s ratio over Judge Dredd’s.

Also look at the Detroit police department. Once OCP took over, they created ED-209s which, with their efficient AI algorithms and superior firepower, will replace the current cost inefficient human workforce with one that will work for free.

How do you determine what’s not in good faith?

I personally always assume good faith. I can't read people's minds. On the Internet, I can't even see facial expressions or hear how they're saying it. It's like that Key and Peele text message sketch.

You haven't gotten through it yet. It's still here.