Then you'll love this one: I saw a post with a map of the Gaza Strip overlaid with the Buc-ee's logo. Someone replied:
From the River to the Sea, Buc-ee's Buy One Get One Free
Then you'll love this one: I saw a post with a map of the Gaza Strip overlaid with the Buc-ee's logo. Someone replied:
From the River to the Sea, Buc-ee's Buy One Get One Free
Fantastic fucking movie.
It may seem cruel, but this is the price we have to pay for a Disneyland in the Middle East.
/s, in case it wasn't achingly obvious
A surprising number of people switched to Trump after the DNC and DWS stabbed Bernie in the back.
Without prejudice for or against the research in question (most may be worthy, but some could be spurious), this is 100% in keeping with his promises to the American people.
Everyone is shocked you're get exactly what it says on the tin.
The Overton Window keeps shifting.
My recollection was erroneous, as I can't (easily) find evidence of them rolling over. But the devices in question still got unlocked, so in the end it didn't matter whether Apple (openly or surreptitiously) cooperated.
It's a good thing Musk wasn't elected.
Troubling precedent, but I expect no one used this anyways. Anybody who needs this would be smart enough to know not to trust so proprietary a device and service.
Given how ~~readily Apple has rolled over for law enforcement in the past~~ loudly Apple has opposed working with law enforcement in the past, only for devices to be magically unlocked anyways, this is (probably) just security theater.
You're thinking of Fiduciary Duty
For example, certain kinds of financial advisers have a fiduciary duty - that is, a duty to act in the best interests of their clients. But the ones with whom mere mortals interact are (quite predatory) salesmen.
In the same vein, I expect politicians do act in good faith towards their larger donors, but don't see themselves as owing anything to their constituents.